ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2022
Validation of a commercial human ELISA to measure hyaluronic acid concentration in feline plasma.
Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelial glycocalyx thickness in cats with naturally occurring trauma or non-traumatic illness: an exploratory study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Serum hyaluronic acid in critically ill dogs and influence of intravenous fluid therapy.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our goal was to validate a human hyaluronic acid (HA) ELISA (Hyaluronic acid plus ELISA; TECOmedical Group) for use in feline plasma. Plasma from 5 healthy cats and 5 critically ill cats was used for validation of the assay. Validation methods performed included intra- and inter-assay variability, spike-and-recovery, and dilutional linearity. All measurements were performed in duplicate. The precision study revealed good intra-assay CV of 7.4-8.9%; inter-assay CV was 3.4-4.2%. Extraction efficiency via spiking tests yielded mean recovery of 89.6%. The assay met criteria for acceptable linearity using 3 serial dilutions. Our results demonstrate that this commercial HA ELISA had acceptable analytical performance using feline plasma and could be a useful tool in the veterinary clinical research setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.