Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34515564›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

Safety and efficacy of intravenous tirofiban for stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A single center experience.

Yihui Ma, Chenguang Jia, Tingbao Zhang, Yu Feng, Xinjun Chen, Wenyuan Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yihui MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.
Chenguang JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.
Tingbao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.
Yu FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.
Xinjun ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-5088
Wenyuan ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, 89674Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-711X
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been few reports on the use of tirofiban in ruptured intracranial aneurysms and the results were conflicting. However, the safety and efficacy of optimal dosage and the reasonable treatment course of tirofiban have not been determined.

objectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of a new protocol for its prophylactic tirofiban application during the endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with no oral antiplatelet medications.

methodsThis retrospective study was based on 105 patients with ruptured aneurysms who underwent stent-assisted coiling at our institution between August 2017 and July 2020. Intravenous tirofiban was administered to patients after stent deployment. Tirofiban was administered as an intravenous bolus (5 µg/kg) over a 3 min period immediately after stent deployment, followed by a 0.06-0.08 µg/kg/min maintenance infusion for 12-24 h. Dual oral antiplatelet therapy was overlapped with half the tirofiban dose 2 h before the cessation of the tirofiban infusion. Cases of intracranial hemorrhage or thromboembolism were recorded.

resultsThis study included a total of 105 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, who underwent stent-assisted coiling. In terms of clinical severity, a presenting Hunt-Hess clinical-grade I was observed in 47 (44.8%) cases, grade II in 19 (18.1%) cases, grade III in 30 (28.6%) cases, grade IV in 6 (5.6%) cases, and grade V in 3 (2.9%) cases. None of the patients showed a newly developed tirofiban-related intracerebral hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage. There were 3 (2.8%) patients who had thromboembolic complications.

conclusionsWe have determined a new protocol for prophylactic intraoperative tirofiban during the endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with no oral antiplatelet medications. In our study, tirofiban showed a low risk of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. Tirofiban appears to be a safe and alternative during the stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmThromboembolismCerebral HemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesStentsTirofibanTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTirofiban

Identifiers

PMID34515564
PMCPMC9326857
OpenAlexW3200716990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.