Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34515379›Full record

SynthesisPediatric dermatology2021

"COVID toes": A meta-analysis of case and observational studies on clinical, histopathological, and laboratory findings.

Kelvin Oliveira Rocha, Virgínia Vinha Zanuncio, Brunnella Alcântara Chagas de Freitas, Luciana Moreira Lima

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Prevalence and patterns of cutaneous manifestations in 1245 COVID-19 patients in Japan: a single-centre study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelvin Oliveira RochaDepartment of Medicine and Nursing, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-1196
Virgínia Vinha ZanuncioDepartment of Medicine and Nursing, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4442-3606
Brunnella Alcântara Chagas de FreitasDepartment of Medicine and Nursing, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-0681
Luciana Moreira LimaDepartment of Medicine and Nursing, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5349-1577
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is related to several extrapulmonary disorders; however, little is known about the clinical, laboratory, and histopathological characteristics of pernio-like skin lesions associated with COVID-19 infection.

objectiveTo evaluate and summarize the clinical, laboratory, and histopathological characteristics of pernio-like lesions reported in the literature.

methodsWe conducted a search of the PubMed, SciELO, and ScienceDirect databases for articles published between January 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020, following the PRISMA recommendations (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020225055). The target population was individuals with suspected or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with pernio-like lesions. Observational studies, research letters, and case/series reports were all eligible for inclusion. Observational studies were evaluated using a random-effects model to calculate the weighted mean prevalence, overall mean, and 95% confidence interval. We evaluated case studies using the chi-square test for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

resultsA total of 187 patients from case reports and 715 patients from 18 observational studies were included. The mean age of patients was 16.6 years (range 14.5-18.8). Feet were affected in 91.4% (87.0-94.4%) of patients in observational studies. The proportion of patients with a positive RT-PCR test was less than 15%. Lesion topography and morphology were associated with age.

conclusionLesions mostly occurred in pediatric patients, and the morphological characteristics tended to differ between pediatric and non-pediatric populations. There is a possible multifactorial component in lesion pathophysiology. The non-positivity of laboratory tests does not exclude an association with COVID-19. Pernio-like lesions may be a late manifestation of COVID-19.

Indexed as

ChilblainsCOVID-19AdolescentChildHumansLaboratoriesObservational Studies as TopicSARS-CoV-2Toeschilblains-likecoronavirusCOVID-19 toespernio-like

Identifiers

PMID34515379
PMCPMC8646534
OpenAlexW3201380981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.