ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macrovascular Hemodynamics and Peripheral Perfusion in Cardiogenic Shock: Exploring Current Targets and Future Directions.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- How we use critical care ultrasonography in the management of cardiogenic shock: a strategic game of chess in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Mortality Predictors in Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Use of a Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic Monitoring in Burn Resuscitation: Current Status.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025Article
- Optimizing outcomes in heart transplantation: multidisciplinary Heart Teams and mechanical circulatory support for primary graft dysfunction.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Outcomes of a Cardiovascular Medicine Inclusive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Service.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Foreword.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Urine output for predicting in-hospital mortality of intensive care patients with cardiogenic shock.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock.Journal of intensive medicine · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- ISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
- Type III procollagen peptide level can indicate liver dysfunction associated with volume overload in acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Impella to Treat Acute Myocardial Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting.US cardiology · 2022Review
- [Invasive hemodynamic monitoring by Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter: concepts and utility].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There is increasing utilization of cardiogenic shock treatment algorithms. The cornerstone of these algorithms is the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring (IHM). We sought to compare the in-hospital outcomes in patients who received IHM versus no IHM in a real-world contemporary database. Methods and Results Patients with cardiogenic shock admitted during October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Among this group, we compared the outcomes among patients who received IHM versus no IHM. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points included vascular complications, major bleeding, need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and rate of utilization of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. Propensity score matching was used for covariate adjustment. A total of 394 635 (IHM=62 565; no IHM=332 070) patients were included. After propensity score matching, 2 well-matched groups were compared (IHM=62 220; no IHM=62 220). The IHM group had lower in-hospital mortality (24.1% versus 30.6%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.