ReviewMolecular oncology2022
Viruses in colorectal cancer.
Review in Molecular oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial Signals in Cancer: Dissecting Host-Microbiota-Tumor Interactions and Potential Therapeutic Strategy.MedComm · 2026Review
- MiR-494-5p suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis by multi-level targeting of KAT2B, a novel mechanism disrupting KAT2B enhancer-promoter looping, and inhibiting c-JUN-driven pro-metastatic properties.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Metagenome analysis reveals multi-kingdom gut microbiota as diagnostic markers for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Viral transformation of stem cells into cancer stem cells and tumor enhancement by immunoexcito-oncomodulation: Accumulating evidence that most cancers are virally induced and further altered to increase their aggressiveness.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Bacteriophages, Antibiotics and Probiotics: Exploring the Microbial Battlefield of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Gut microbes and their metabolites in relation to the classic tumor suppressor gene P53: a novel narrative.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Intestinal dysbiosis and colorectal cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Neurotropic Viruses as Acute and Insidious Drivers of Aging.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- lncRNABiomedicines · 2025Article
- Clinical and molecular analysis of JCPyV and BKPyV infection and associated risk of urothelial carcinoma development in the upper tract.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Frequency of BK virus genotypes in patients with colorectal cancer.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- A landscape review with novel criteria to evaluate microbial drivers for cancer: priorities for innovative research targeting excessive cancer mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Epstein-Barr Virus and Human Papillomavirus Coinfection in Colorectal Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Beyond bacteria: Role of non-bacterial gut microbiota species in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer progression.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Role of Gut Microbiota in Predisposition to Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- The mysterious anelloviruses: investigating its role in human diseases.BMC microbiology · 2024Review
- Bacteriophages: a double-edged sword in the gastrointestinal tract.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2024Review
- Coinfections with additional oncoviruses in HPV+ individuals: Status, function and potential clinical implications.Journal of medical virology · 2024Review
- The role of fungi in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Mycology · 2024Review
- JAK1 Is a Novel Target of Tumor- and Invasion-Suppressive microRNA 494-5p in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that microorganisms might represent at least highly interesting cofactors in colorectal cancer (CRC) oncogenesis and progression. Still, associated mechanisms, specifically in colonocytes and their microenvironmental interactions, are still poorly understood. Although, currently, at least seven viruses are being recognized as human carcinogens, only three of these - Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human papillomavirus (HPV) and John Cunningham virus (JCV) - have been described, with varying levels of evidence, in CRC. In addition, cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been associated with CRC in some publications, albeit not being a fully acknowledged oncovirus. Moreover, recent microbiome studies set increasing grounds for new hypotheses on bacteriophages as interesting additional modulators in CRC carcinogenesis and progression. The present Review summarizes how particular groups of viruses, including bacteriophages, affect cells and the cellular and microbial microenvironment, thereby putatively contributing to foster CRC. This could be achieved, for example, by promoting several processes - such as DNA damage, chromosomal instability, or molecular aspects of cell proliferation, CRC progression and metastasis - not necessarily by direct infection of epithelial cells only, but also by interaction with the microenvironment of infected cells. In this context, there are striking common features of EBV, CMV, HPV and JCV that are able to promote oncogenesis, in terms of establishing latent infections and affecting p53-/pRb-driven, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-/EGFR-associated and especially Wnt/β-catenin-driven pathways. We speculate that, at least in part, such viral impacts on particular pathways might be reflected in lasting (e.g. mutational or further genomic) fingerprints of viruses in cells. Also, the complex interplay between several species within the intestinal microbiome, involving a direct or indirect impact on colorectal and microenvironmental cells but also between, for example, phages and bacterial and viral pathogens, and further novel species certainly might, in part, explain ongoing difficulties to establish unequivocal monocausal links between specific viral infections and CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.