Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514652›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

The effect of per os vs subcutaneous

Kevin Cosford, Elisabeth Snead, Matt Hutcheson, Sally Sukut

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of per os vs subcutaneousJournal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin CosfordDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-2619
Elisabeth SneadDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Matt HutchesonDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1531-3328
Sally SukutDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Saskatoon Medical Imaging · CA

Funding

University of Saskatchewan WCVM FR & R Fund 419603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorical and recent literature disagree on whether a higher PO HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesTo investigate the effect of PO and SC routes of ANIMALS: Seven healthy euthyroid teaching-research colony cats.

methodsA randomized, radiologist-blinded crossover study comparing %RAIU after PO and SC

resultsPercentage thyroidal RAIU values (mean ± SD; 95% confidence interval) after PO (4.81% ± 1.63%; 3.30%-6.23%) and SC (5.26% ± 2.43%; 3.01%-7.51%) CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This study did not detect an effect of

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesHyperthyroidismIodineThyroid NeoplasmsAnimalsCatsCross-Over StudiesInjections, SubcutaneousIodine RadioisotopesIodineIodine Radioisotopes123I thyroid scintigraphyeuthyroid catspercentage thyroidal radioactive iodine uptakeroute of iodine administration

Identifiers

PMID34514652
PMCPMC8692174
OpenAlexW3201361960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.