Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514535›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2022

The Built Environment and Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Review on Quantitative Health Impact Assessments.

M Thondoo, R Goel, L Tatah, N Naraynen, J Woodcock, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M ThondooCentre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Dr. Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
R GoelMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
L TatahMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
N NaraynenDepartment of Economics, International Business School, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
J WoodcockMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mark NieuwenhuijsenCentre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Dr. Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. mark.nieuwenhuijsen@isglobal.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFeatures and attributes of the built environment (BE) impact positively and negatively on health, especially in cities facing unprecedented urban population growth and mass motorization. A common approach to assess the health impacts of built environment is health impact assessment (HIA), but it is rarely used in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where urbanization rates are fastest. This article reviews selected HIA case studies from LMICs and reports the methods and tools used to support further implementation of quantitative HIAs in cities of LMICs. RECENT

findingsIn total, 24 studies were reviewed across Algeria, Brazil, China, India, Iran, Kenya, Thailand, Turkey, and Mauritius. HIAs examine specific pathways through which the built environment acts: air pollution, noise, physical activity, and traffic injury. Few HIAs of BE addressed more than one exposure pathway at a time, and most studies focused on air pollution across the sectors of transport and energy. A wide number of tools were used to conduct exposure assessment, and different models were applied to assess health impacts of different exposures. Those HIAs rely on availability of local concentration data and often use models that have set exposure-response functions (ERFs). ERFs were not adapted to local populations except for HIAs conducted in China. HIAs of BE are being successfully conducted in LMICs with a variety of tools and datasets. Scaling and expanding quantitative health impact modeling in LMICs will require further study on data availability, adapted models/tools, low technical capacity, and low policy demand for evidence from modeling studies. As case studies with successful use of evidence from modeling emerge, the uptake of health impact modeling of BE is likely to increase in favor of people and planet.

Indexed as

Air PollutionHealth Impact AssessmentBuilt EnvironmentCitiesDeveloping CountriesHumansBuilt environmentHealthPolicyQuantitative health impact modelingUrban and transport planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.