ArticleClinical rheumatology2022
Myositis autoantibodies in Iranian myositis patients: assessment the frequency and clinical relevancy.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are known as two major types of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IMMs). During the past years, growing data strongly suggest the clinical significance of myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) and myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs). The present study aimed to determine the profile of MSAs and MAAs, subsequently to address the clinical significance of these autoantibodies in Iranian myositis patients. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study, 28 DM and 24 PM patients were entered. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected by direct examination and patients' medical record. The existence of MSAs and MAAs was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence then using immunoblotting (FA 1510-1005-1, DL 1530-1601-4 G; Euroimmun, Germany). Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (v22; SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 46.18 ± 12.95 years and male/female ratio was 28.8/71.2. Autoantibodies were positive in 63.46% of myositis patients. Interestingly, anti-TIF1γ and anti-PL7 were significantly associated with malignancy (P < 0.001, P = 0.008; respectively). The existence of autoantibody and anti-Jo1 had significant relation with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (P = 0.034, P = 0.006; respectively). Joint involvements including arthritis and arthralgia were significantly associated with anti-Ro52 and anti-Jo1 (P = 0.04, P = 0.02; respectively).
conclusionTaken together, it can be concluded that certain myositis autoantibodies present clinical significance which is in line with the literature. The use of these autoantibodies as biomarkers by line blotting along with indirect immunofluorescence facilitates diagnosis of inflammatory myopathies and makes it more accurate as well as better management of myositis patients if used based on a science-based manner. Key Points • Identification of MSAs and MAAs facilitates the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathies and provides better myositis patient's management if used according to a science-based manner. • Anti-rod and ring antibody was detected in a patient with ovarian cancer-induced dermatomyositis. • Malignancy and ILD are integrated parts of myositis which can be associated with MSAs and MAAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.