Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514393›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

CADA: phenotype-driven gene prioritization based on a case-enriched knowledge graph.

Chengyao Peng, Simon Dieck, Alexander Schmid, Ashar Ahmad, Alexej Knaus, Maren Wenzel, Laura Mehnert, Birgit Zirn, Tobias Haack, Stephan Ossowski and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PhenoSS: phenotype semantic similarity-based approach for rare disease prediction and patient clustering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. REEV: review, evaluate and explain variants.Nucleic acids research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. KG-Hub-building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  19. The future role of facial image analysis in ACMG classification guidelines.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chengyao PengInstitute for Genomic Statistics, University Bonn, 53129 Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9765-4400
Simon DieckInstitute for Genomic Statistics, University Bonn, 53129 Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-0670
Alexander SchmidInstitute for Genomic Statistics, University Bonn, 53129 Bonn, Germany.
Ashar AhmadFraunhofer SCAI, Department of Bioinformatics, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Alexej KnausInstitute for Genomic Statistics, University Bonn, 53129 Bonn, Germany.
Maren WenzelGenetikum Counseling Center, 70173 Stuttgart, Germany.
Laura MehnertGenetikum Counseling Center, 70173 Stuttgart, Germany.
Birgit ZirnGenetikum Counseling Center, 70173 Stuttgart, Germany.
Tobias HaackInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan OssowskiInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Matias WagnerInstitute for Human Genetics, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4454-8823
Theresa BrunetInstitute for Human Genetics, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Nadja EhmkeInstitute for Medical Genetics, Charité University Medicine, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Magdalena DanyelInstitute for Medical Genetics, Charité University Medicine, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Stanislav RosnevGeneTalk GmbH, 53129 Bonn, Germany.
Tom KamphansGeneTalk GmbH, 53129 Bonn, Germany.
Guy NadavFDNA Inc, FL 33325 Sunrise, USA.
Nicole FleischerFDNA Inc, FL 33325 Sunrise, USA.
Holger FröhlichFraunhofer SCAI, Department of Bioinformatics, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEGenetikum · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many rare syndromes can be well described and delineated from other disorders by a combination of characteristic symptoms. These phenotypic features are best documented with terms of the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO), which are increasingly used in electronic health records (EHRs), too. Many algorithms that perform HPO-based gene prioritization have also been developed; however, the performance of many such tools suffers from an over-representation of atypical cases in the medical literature. This is certainly the case if the algorithm cannot handle features that occur with reduced frequency in a disorder. With Cada, we built a knowledge graph based on both case annotations and disorder annotations. Using network representation learning, we achieve gene prioritization by link prediction. Our results suggest that Cada exhibits superior performance particularly for patients that present with the pathognomonic findings of a disease. Additionally, information about the frequency of occurrence of a feature can readily be incorporated, when available. Crucial in the design of our approach is the use of the growing amount of phenotype-genotype information that diagnostic labs deposit in databases such as ClinVar. By this means, Cada is an ideal reference tool for differential diagnostics in rare disorders that can also be updated regularly.

Identifiers

PMID34514393
PMCPMC8415429
OpenAlexW3134093132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.