Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514352›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2021

Workflow analysis for design of an electronic health record-based tobacco cessation intervention in community health centers.

Bryan Gibson, Heidi Kramer, Charlene Weir, Guilherme Fiol, Damian Borbolla, Chelsey R Schlechter, Cho Lam, Marci Nelson, Claudia Bohner, Sandra Schulthies and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07073898 (Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07073898 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsLung CancerArmsRepeated Text Messages (TM+), Conversational Agent (CA), Educational Video, Proactive Patient Navigation (PPN), Reactive Patient Navigation (RPN)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan GibsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Heidi KramerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Charlene WeirDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Guilherme FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Damian BorbollaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Chelsey R SchlechterCenter for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Cho LamCenter for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Marci NelsonTobacco Prevention and Control Program Utah, Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Claudia BohnerTobacco Prevention and Control Program Utah, Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sandra SchulthiesTobacco Prevention and Control Program Utah, Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Tracey SieperasAssociation for Utah Community Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Alan PruhsAssociation for Utah Community Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Inbal Nahum-ShaniInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Maria E FernandezCenter for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-7379
David W WetterCenter for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USUtah Department of Health · USAssociation for Utah Community Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Novel Methods for Intensive Longitudinal Data in SMART Studies of Drug Abuse and HIVR01DA039901 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALMIRALL, DANIEL, NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTobacco use is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the United States. Quitlines are effective telephone-based tobacco cessation services but are underutilized. The goal of this project was to describe current clinical workflows for Quitline referral and design an optimal electronic health record (EHR)-based workflow for Ask-Advice-Connect (AAC), an evidence-based intervention to increase Quitline referrals. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen Community Health Center systems (CHC), which use three different EHRs, participated in this study. Methods included: 9 group discussions with CHC leaders; 33 observations/interviews of clinical teams' workflow; surveys with 57 clinical staff; and assessment of the EHR ecosystem in each CHC. Data across these methods were integrated and coded according to the Fit between Individual, Task, Technology and Environment (FITTE) framework. The current and optimal workflow were notated using Business Process Modelling Notation. We compared the requirements of the optimal workflow with EHR capabilities.

resultsCurrent workflows are inefficient in data collection, variable in who, how, and when tobacco cessation advice and referral are enacted, and lack communication between referring clinics and the Quitline. In the optimal workflow, medical assistants deliver a standardized AAC intervention during the visit intake. Referrals are submitted electronically, and there is bidirectional communication between the clinic and Quitline. We implemented AAC within all three EHRs; however, deviations from the optimal workflow were necessary.

conclusionCurrent workflows for Quitline referral are inefficient and ineffective. We propose an optimal workflow and discuss improvements in EHR capabilities that would improve the implementation of AAC.

Indexed as

community health centerselectronic health recordsreminder systemstobacco use cessation

Identifiers

PMID34514352
PMCPMC8423419
OpenAlexW3130795136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.