Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514294›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2021

'It's just a great muddle when it comes to food': a qualitative exploration of patient decision-making around diet and gout.

Jennifer Liddle, Jane C Richardson, Samantha L Hider, Christian D Mallen, Lorraine Watson, Priyanka Chandratre, Edward Roddy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07061587 (Developing A Gout Action Plan in Primary Care Setting in Singapore), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07061587 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Developing A Gout Action Plan in Primary Care Setting in Singapore

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2025 to 2027Enrolled72ConditionsGout, Hyperuricemia, Gout Flare, Gout ChronicArmsGout action plan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer LiddlePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1059-1230
Jane C RichardsonSchool of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Samantha L HiderSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-3909
Christian D MallenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Lorraine WatsonSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Priyanka ChandratreSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Edward RoddySchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Keele University · GBMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to understand whether, why and how patients choose to modify their diets after developing gout.

methodsWe conducted an inductive thematic secondary analysis of qualitative data from 43 interviews and four focus groups with UK participants with gout (

resultsParticipants commonly initiated dietary changes as part of a self-management strategy for gout. Reasons for making such dietary changes included: desperation; a desire for control; and belief that it would be possible to achieve successful management through diet alone; but not weight loss. Participants who did not make changes or who reverted to previous dietary patterns did so because: they believed urate-lowering therapy was successfully managing their gout; medication allowed normal eating; they did not find 'proof' that diet would be an effective treatment; or the dietary advice they found was unrealistic, unmanageable or irrelevant. Dietary modification was patient led, but patients would have preferred the support of a health-care professional. Beliefs that diet could potentially explain and modify the timing of flares gave patients a sense of control over the condition. However, the belief that gout could be controlled through dietary modification appeared to be a barrier to acceptance of management with urate-lowering therapy.

conclusionsPerceptions about gout and diet play a large role in the way patients make decisions about how to manage gout in their everyday lives. Addressing the reasons why patients explore dietary solutions, promoting the value of urate-lowering therapy and weight loss and drawing on strong evidence to communicate clearly will be crucial in improving long-term clinical management and patient experience.

Indexed as

dietgoutinflammatory arthritislong-term conditionpatient experiencequalitativeself-management

Identifiers

PMID34514294
PMCPMC8421808
OpenAlexW3194639974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.