ReviewJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2019
Eccentric Reaming for B2 Glenoids: History, Preoperative Planning, Surgical Technique, and Outcome.
Review in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of B2 type glenoids with anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Surgical management of biconcave glenoids: a scoping review.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Article
- Review
- Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- Treatment options for complex shoulder osteoarthritis with posterior humeral head subluxation and glenoid bone loss (Walch B): A systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2022Review
- Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.Skeletal radiology · 2021Review
- Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe biconcave (B2) glenoid is characterized by preservation of the anterior portion of the native glenoid with asymmetric wear of the posterior glenoid. Surgical options for glenoid correction have evolved. The goal of shoulder arthroplasty is to place the implants in such a manner to return the humeral head to a centered position and restore the joint line to a neutral position. There is no current consensus on method of treatment and correction.
methodsThe current and historical literature on total shoulder arthroplasty was used to examine technique viability.
resultsAsymmetric remaining can be used to address up to 15° of version correction without compromise of cortical bone. It is important to have the proper presurgical planning, to understand the limitations of correction, and to have other options available to treat the biconcave glenoid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.