Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514106›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2021

Prolonged Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion Is Superior to Cold Nonoxygenated and Oxygenated Machine Perfusion for the Preservation of DCD Porcine Kidney Grafts.

Laura I Mazilescu, Peter Urbanellis, Moritz J Kaths, Sujani Ganesh, Toru Goto, Yuki Noguchi, Rohan John, Ana Konvalinka, Istvan Mucsi, Anand Ghanekar and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pushing the boundaries of innovation: the potential ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. NormothermicTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Laura I MazilescuMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter UrbanellisMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Moritz J KathsDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sujani GaneshMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Toru GotoMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yuki NoguchiMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rohan JohnDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ana KonvalinkaInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Istvan MucsiMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anand GhanekarMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Darius J BagliDepartment of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julie TurgeonCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Annie Karakeusian RimbaudCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Marie-Josée HébertCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mélanie DieudéCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Isabelle AlleysDépartement de Microbiologie et Immunologie, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Etienne DoreDépartement de Microbiologie et Immunologie, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Eric BoilardCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Herman S OverkleeftDepartment of Bioorganic Synthesis, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lianne I WillemsDepartment of Chemistry, The University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Lisa A RobinsonDivision of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Markus SelznerMulti-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University Health Network · CATranslational Research in Oncology · CALeiden University · NLUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased usage of marginal grafts has triggered interest in perfused kidney preservation to minimize graft injury. We used a donation after circulatory death (DCD) porcine kidney autotransplantation model to compare 3 of the most frequently used ex vivo kidney perfusion techniques: nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (non-oxHMP), oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (oxHMP), and normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP).

methodsFollowing 30 min of warm ischemia, grafts were retrieved and preserved with either 16 h of non-oxHMP, oxHMP, or NEVKP (n = 5 per group). After contralateral nephrectomy, grafts were autotransplanted and animals were followed for 8 d. Kidney function and injury markers were compared between groups.

resultsNEVKP demonstrated a significant reduction in preservation injury compared with either cold preservation method. Grafts preserved by NEVKP showed superior function with lower peak serum creatinine (NEVKP versus non-oxHMP versus oxHMP: 3.66 ± 1.33 mg/dL, 8.82 ± 3.17 mg/dL, and 9.02 ± 5.5 mg/dL) and more rapid recovery. The NEVKP group demonstrated significantly increased creatinine clearance on postoperative day 3 compared with the cold perfused groups. Tubular injury scores on postoperative day 8 were similar in all groups.

conclusionsAddition of oxygen during HMP did not reduce preservation injury of DCD kidney grafts. Grafts preserved with prolonged NEVKP demonstrated superior initial graft function compared with grafts preserved with non-oxHMP or oxHMP in a model of pig DCD kidney transplantation.

Identifiers

PMID34514106
PMCPMC8425822
OpenAlexW3196528149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.