Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514068›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2021

Numan Dedeoğlu, Şuayip Burak Duman, Oğuzhan Altun, Büşra Arıkan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Numan DedeoğluDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Şuayip Burak DumanDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Oğuzhan AltunDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Büşra ArıkanDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Inonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

statement of the problemIntraosseous lesions of jaws can be imaged by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ultrasonography (USG). The knowledge of imaging features of these two methods about intraosseous jaw lesions is important for dental radiology. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate artificial mandible intraosseous lesions by using CBCT and USG. MATERIALS AND

methodIn this

resultsIn all size measurements of the lesions, mean CBCT values were statistically higher when compared with USG. In CBCT images, statistically difference was found between the HU values of lesions containing olive oil and other lesion contents. In USG images, echogenicity of water, milk and olive oil was found to be anechoic and the echogenicity of liver was found to be hypoechoic.

conclusionCBCT was found to be more accurate than USG in measurement of the size of mandibular intraosseous lesions. According to the results of our study, it was thought that only oil content could be differentiated by using CBCT HU values. It was found that lesions with liquid and non-liquid contents could be differentiated with their echogenicity difference in USG images.

Indexed as

Artificial mandibleCone beam computed tomographyIntraosseous lesionUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34514068
PMCPMC8417550
OpenAlexW3187388571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.