ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021
Medical Advisability of Youth Pitching Recommendations on the Internet.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pitch Clock Increases Tolerated Workload Before Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Major League Baseball.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Differences in the Medical Advisability of Online Pitching Recommendations for Youth Softball Players Based on Website Source.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the incidence of youth pitching injuries and surgical procedures attributed to overuse has drastically increased, there are quality concerns about popular internet resources regarding arm care for youth pitchers. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the medical advisability of online arm care recommendations for youth pitchers. It was hypothesized that websites contain misleading arm-care information that is discordant with medical advice. STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsWe reviewed the first 100 websites populated after a Google search for
resultsOf the 99 qualifying websites, 76 were categorized as medically advisable, 16 as discordant, and 7 as neutral. In addition, 92% of educational websites and 94.7% of athletic organization websites featured exclusively advisable content, whereas only 54.8% of commercial websites were advisable. Of the 16 discordant websites, 15 were commercial sites. Educational websites were significantly more advisable and neutral in content when compared with discordant information, while commercial websites were significantly predictive of discordant content. Among the first 50 websites populated according to Google, 42 (84%) were advisable, 6 (12%) discordant, and 2 (4%) neutral. The remaining websites (n = 49) featured 34 (69.4%) that were advisable, 10 (20.4%) discordant, and 5 (10.2%) neutral.
conclusionStudy findings indicated that websites of an educational nature are predictive of medically advisable content, while commercial websites (eg, blogs) are associated with discordant information. The abundance and availability of inaccurate internet information should be appreciated by medical professionals and parents/coaches of youth baseball players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.