Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513656›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2021

Online Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy (oMRgRT) for Gynecological Cancers.

Lorraine Portelance, Stefanie Corradini, Beth Erickson, Susan Lalondrelle, Kyle Padgett, Femke van der Leij, Astrid van Lier, Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences and Technologies in Adaptive Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Lorraine PortelanceSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Beth EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Susan LalondrelleDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research London, London, United Kingdom.
Kyle PadgettSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Femke van der LeijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Astrid van LierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ina Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Miami · USLMU Klinikum · DEMedical College of Wisconsin · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 28284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is increasingly being used in gynecological cancer management. RT delivered with curative or palliative intent can be administered alone or combined with chemotherapy or surgery. Advanced treatment planning and delivery techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, including volumetric modulated arc therapy, and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy allow for highly conformal radiation dose delivery leading to improved tumor control rates and less treatment toxicity. Quality on-board imaging that provides accurate visualization of target and surrounding organs at risk is a critical feature of these advanced techniques. As soft tissue contrast resolution is superior with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to other imaging modalities, MRI has been used increasingly to delineate tumor from adjacent soft tissues and organs at risk from initial diagnosis to tumor response evaluation. Gynecological cancers often have poor contrast resolution compared to the surrounding tissues on computed tomography scan, and consequently the benefit of MRI is high. One example is in management of locally advanced cervix cancer where adaptive MRI guidance has been broadly implemented for adaptive brachytherapy. The role of MRI for external beam RT is also steadily increasing. MRI information is being used for treatment planning, predicting, and monitoring position shifts and accounting for tissue deformation and target regression during treatment. The recent clinical introduction of online MRI-guided radiation therapy (oMRgRT) could be the next step in high-precision RT. This technology provides a tool to take full advantage of MRI not only at the time of initial treatment planning but as well as for daily position verification and online plan adaptation. Cervical, endometrial, vaginal, and oligometastatic ovarian cancers are being treated on MRI linear accelerator systems throughout the world. This review summarizes the current state, early experience, ongoing trials, and future directions of oMRgRT in the management of gynecological cancers.

Indexed as

cervical cancergynecological cancersMR-guided radiotherapyMR Linaconline MR guided radiation therapySBRT

Identifiers

PMID34513656
PMCPMC8429611
OpenAlexW3197999471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.