Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513654›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Association Between Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Sex: An Updated Meta-Analysis on 21 Trials and 12,675 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Chongxiang Xue, Shuyue Zheng, Huijing Dong, Xingyu Lu, Xu Zhang, Jingyi Zhang, Jia Li, Huijuan Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. [Gender medicine in lung diseases].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chongxiang XueChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Shuyue ZhengDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Huijing DongChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xingyu LuChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xu ZhangChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jingyi ZhangChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jia LiChina-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Huijuan CuiDepartment of Integrative Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMounting randomized clinical trials have proved that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieved better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than chemotherapy drugs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, some literatures have indicated that different sexes might not have equal immune response. Also, no agreement reached on the issue whether therapeutic benefit of ICIs is related to sex.

objectivesTo explore the association between efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC patients and their sexes and summarize overall treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in an exploratory manner.

methodsWe performed this systematic review and meta-analysis of all potentially relevant studies retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library until June 2021, for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunotherapy with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients. Literature screening, summary data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of OS, PFS and TRAEs were calculated, applying STATA software and random-effects models. This study was registered in international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), number CRD42020210797.

resultsTwenty-one trials involving 12,675 NSCLC patients were included. For patients with advanced NSCLC, ICIs significantly prolonged the OS (males: HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.67-0.79; females: HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.61-0.85) and PFS (males: HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55-0.70; females: HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.81)

conclusionOur findings indicated that the interaction between immunotherapy efficacy and different sexes was equally evident. Overall, patients with NSCLC could obtain more benefits from ICIs than chemotherapy regimen regardless of their sexes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), identifier CRD42020210797.

Indexed as

different sexesimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmeta-analysisnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)patients’ selection

Identifiers

PMID34513654
PMCPMC8427763
OpenAlexW3197841346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.