ArticleResults in physics2021
Clustering of COVID-19 data for knowledge discovery using c-means and fuzzy c-means.
Article in Results in physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An investigation into epidemiological situations of COVID-19 with fuzzy K-means and K-prototype clustering methods.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A new mathematical model of multi-faced COVID-19 formulated by fractional derivative chains.Advances in continuous and discrete models · 2022Article
- Fuzzy Clustering Methods to Identify the Epidemiological Situation and Its Changes in European Countries during COVID-19.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, the partitioning clustering of COVID-19 data using c-Means (cM) and Fuzy c-Means (Fc-M) algorithms is carried out. Based on the data available from January 2020 with respect to location, i.e., longitude and latitude of the globe, the confirmed daily cases, recoveries, and deaths are clustered. In the analysis, the maximum cluster size is treated as a variable and is varied from 5 to 50 in both algorithms to find out an optimum number. The performance and validity indices of the clusters formed are analyzed to assess the quality of clusters. The validity indices to understand all the COVID-19 clusters' quality are analysed based on the Zahid SC (Separation Compaction) index, Xie-Beni Index, Fukuyama-Sugeno Index, Validity function, PC (performance coefficient), and CE (entropy) indexes. The analysis results pointed out that five clusters were identified as a major centroid where the pandemic looks concentrated. Additionally, the observations revealed that mainly the pandemic is distributed easily at any global location, and there are several centroids of COVID-19, which primarily act as epicentres. However, the three main COVID-19 clusters identified are 1) cases with value <50,000, 2) cases with a value between 0.1 million to 2 million, and 3) cases above 2 million. These centroids are located in the US, Brazil, and India, where the rest of the small clusters of the pandemic look oriented. Furthermore, the Fc-M technique seems to provide a much better cluster than the c-M algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.