ReviewCureus2021
Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Hypogonadal Men and Myocardial Infarction Risk: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Cardiovascular Safety of Testosterone-Replacement Therapy in Middle-Aged and Older Men: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Pooled it
- Intervening at the microbial crossroads: targeting inflammation across the oral-gut-reproductive microbiome crosstalk in atherosclerosis.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- Impact of Testosterone Therapy on Major Cardiovascular Risk in Erectile Dysfunction Patients with Testosterone Deficiency.Research and reports in urology · 2024Article
- Review
- Relationships between endogenous and exogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease in men.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Clomiphene-induced myocardial infarction in a young male: A case report of a rare cardiovascular complication.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has become increasingly popular over the years and there has been an increasing debate on whether testosterone replacement should be offered to older men due to its association with cardiovascular events. In this study, we evaluated the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with TRT in hypogonadal men through a meta-analysis. We carried out the analysis by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and conducted a literature search utilizing the following databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search strategy resulted in a total of 782 articles, after applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Six observational studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for the analysis. A total of 55,806 hypogonadal men with baseline testosterone levels <300ng/mL were included in the analysis. The intervention group received testosterone in various routes including transdermal patches, gels, mouth patches, testosterone injections, and deposits. The incidence of MI was taken to be the primary measure outcomes. The pooled data from eight studies showed MI incidence in 249 out of 11,720 (2.1%) in the TRT group and 1420 out of 33,086 (4.3%) in the control group. The pooled OD showed no statistically significant association of TRT and MI compared to the control group (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.31; p=0.48). The model revealed high heterogeneity with I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.