ArticleCureus2021
Plain Radiographs Can Safely Be Used to Measure and Follow Up on Tibial Component Alignment in Unicondylar Knee Replacement: A Correlation Study With CT Scans.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Varus tibial alignment is associated with improved joint awareness after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Unicondylar knee replacement (UKR) is one of the most frequently performed arthroplastic operations worldwide. Migration and subsidence regarding the tibial component of UKR is a well-known phenomenon. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether plain radiographs are a reliable means to measure the true coronal and sagittal alignment of the UKR's tibial component. Methods Patients undergoing a UKR procedure at our center between December 2020 and March 2011 were eligible for this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the presence of well-aligned standard and reproducible anteroposterior and lateral X-rays taken one week before or after a low-radiation artifact-reduced CT scan. Sixty-six knees were included in the study. Coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component was measured in a standard manner by two observers on both X-rays and CT scans. A correlation analysis was performed, and the margin of error was established. Results Intra-observer reliability was high among the two observers whether for X-ray or CT scan measurements [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): >0.900]. On the other hand, coronal plane measurements had lower inter-observer ICC values on both X-rays and CT scans while reliability on the sagittal plane was higher. There was a high correlation between radiographic measurements on X-rays and CT scans on both planes. Conclusion Even though the measurements on plain radiographs were slightly different from the ones obtained from CT scans, the correlation between them was very strong. Caution should be exercised when measuring the coronal alignment of the tibial implant on X-rays since it is more frequently affected by rotational misalignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.