Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513290›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2021

Integrative analysis reveals clinically relevant molecular fingerprints in pancreatic cancer.

Libin Song, Simin Qi, Wei Hu, Zhixiao Fang, Dehua Yu, Teng Liu, Jingni Wu, Yangjun Wu, Aiwei Wu, Lanyun Feng and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Libin SongDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Simin QiCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Wei HuPrecision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTU-SM), Shanghai 201620, China.
Zhixiao FangPrecision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTU-SM), Shanghai 201620, China.
Dehua YuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Teng LiuPrecision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTU-SM), Shanghai 201620, China.
Jingni WuPrecision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTU-SM), Shanghai 201620, China.
Yangjun WuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Aiwei WuSheng Yushou Center of Cell Biology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Lanyun FengDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jing XieDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Bo ZhangThe Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institutes of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Wenguang HeShanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan 030013, China.
Zhouyu NingDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Luming LiuDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jiang-Jiang QinCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Shengli LiPrecision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTU-SM), Shanghai 201620, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNShanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive cancer with an exceedingly low rate of response to treatments, which calls for comprehensive molecular characterization of pancreatic cancer cell lines (PCCLs). We screened multi-layer molecular data of 36 PCCLs, including gene mutation, gene expression, microRNA (miRNA) expression, and protein profiles. Our comparative analysis of genomic mutations found that PCCLs recapitulated genomic alterations of the primary tumor and suggested potential therapeutic strategies for clinical interventions. The panel of 36 PCCLs was classified into 2 subgroups based on transcriptomic mRNA expression, wherein the C1 subgroup was characterized with differentiation, whereas C2 cell lines were featured with immunity, angiogenesis, epidermis, and proliferation. Transcriptomic classification was further recapitulated by miRNA and protein expression. Additionally, the differential proteins between C1 and C2 subgroups were prominently involved in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Tumor samples from different subgroups exhibited distinct infiltration of CD4 naive cells and monocytes. Remarkably, patients in subgroups C1 showed longer survival, whereas those in C2 had worse clinical outcome. Further integrative analysis revealed that temozolomide and NVP-TAE684 showed higher sensitivity in the C1 subgroup, whereas the C2 cell lines were more sensitive to SR1001 and SRT-1720. Our results also showed that PCCLs with mutations in CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4 were more sensitive to certain anti-cancer drugs. Our integrative analysis identified molecular features of pancreatic cancer that were associated with clinical significance and drug sensitivity, providing potentially effective strategies for precision treatments of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

cancer cell linesdrug responseintegrative analysismulti-omics datapancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer subgroups

Identifiers

PMID34513290
PMCPMC8408433
OpenAlexW3182882338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.