ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Deep learning classification of cervical dysplasia using depth-resolved angular light scattering profiles.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Convolutional neural network-based regression analysis to predict subnuclear chromatin organization from two-dimensional optical scattering signals.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Next-generation endoscopic probe for detection of esophageal dysplasia using combined OCT and angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present a machine learning method for detecting and staging cervical dysplastic tissue using light scattering data based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture. Depth-resolved angular scattering measurements from two clinical trials were used to generate independent training and validation sets as input of our model. We report 90.3% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, and 87.5% accuracy in classifying cervical dysplasia, showing the uniformity of classification of a/LCI scans across different instruments. Further, our deep learning approach significantly improved processing speeds over the traditional Mie theory inverse light scattering analysis (ILSA) method, with a hundredfold reduction in processing time, offering a promising approach for a/LCI in the clinic for assessing cervical dysplasia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.