Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513215›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Brightfield, fluorescence, and phase-contrast whole slide imaging via dual-LED autofocusing.

Chengfei Guo, Zichao Bian, Soliman Alhudaithy, Shaowei Jiang, Yuji Tomizawa, Pengming Song, Tianbo Wang, Xiaopeng Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chengfei GuoXi'an Key Laboratory of Computational Imaging, Xidian University, Shaanxi, 710071, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3816-4118
Zichao BianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5757-2112
Soliman AlhudaithyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-2548
Shaowei JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Yuji TomizawaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Pengming SongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Tianbo WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Xiaopeng ShaoXi'an Key Laboratory of Computational Imaging, Xidian University, Shaanxi, 710071, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole slide imaging (WSI) systems convert the conventional biological samples into digital images. Existing commercial WSI systems usually require an expensive high-performance motorized stage to implement the precise mechanical control, and the cost is prohibitive for most individual pathologists. In this work, we report a low-cost WSI system using the off-the-shelf components, including a computer numerical control (CNC) router, a photographic lens, a programmable LED array, a fluorescence filter cube, and a surface-mount LED. To perform real-time single-frame autofocusing, we exploited two elements of a programmable LED array to illuminate the sample from two different incident angles. The captured image would contain two copies of the sample with a certain separation determined by the defocus distance of the sample. Then the defocus distance can be recovered by identifying the translational shift of the two copies. The reported WSI system can reach a resolution of ∼0.7 µm. The time to determine the optimal focusing position for each tile is only 0.02 s, which is about an 83% improvement compared to our previous work. We quantified the focusing performance on 1890 different tissue tiles. The mean focusing error is ∼0.34 µm, which is well below the ± 0.7 µm depth of field range of our WSI system. The reported WSI system can handle both the semitransparent and the transparent sample, enabling us to demonstrate the implementation of brightfield, fluorescence, and phase-contrast WSI. An automatic digital distortion correction strategy is also developed to avoid the stitching errors. The reported prototype has an affordable cost and can make it broadly available and utilizable for individual pathologists as well as can promote the development of digital pathology.

Identifiers

PMID34513215
PMCPMC8407850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.