ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Brightfield, fluorescence, and phase-contrast whole slide imaging via dual-LED autofocusing.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust autofocus method based on patterned active illumination and image cross-correlation analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Innovative Image Processing Method to Improve Autofocusing Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Brightfield, fluorescence, and phase-contrast whole slide imaging via dual-LED autofocusing.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole slide imaging (WSI) systems convert the conventional biological samples into digital images. Existing commercial WSI systems usually require an expensive high-performance motorized stage to implement the precise mechanical control, and the cost is prohibitive for most individual pathologists. In this work, we report a low-cost WSI system using the off-the-shelf components, including a computer numerical control (CNC) router, a photographic lens, a programmable LED array, a fluorescence filter cube, and a surface-mount LED. To perform real-time single-frame autofocusing, we exploited two elements of a programmable LED array to illuminate the sample from two different incident angles. The captured image would contain two copies of the sample with a certain separation determined by the defocus distance of the sample. Then the defocus distance can be recovered by identifying the translational shift of the two copies. The reported WSI system can reach a resolution of ∼0.7 µm. The time to determine the optimal focusing position for each tile is only 0.02 s, which is about an 83% improvement compared to our previous work. We quantified the focusing performance on 1890 different tissue tiles. The mean focusing error is ∼0.34 µm, which is well below the ± 0.7 µm depth of field range of our WSI system. The reported WSI system can handle both the semitransparent and the transparent sample, enabling us to demonstrate the implementation of brightfield, fluorescence, and phase-contrast WSI. An automatic digital distortion correction strategy is also developed to avoid the stitching errors. The reported prototype has an affordable cost and can make it broadly available and utilizable for individual pathologists as well as can promote the development of digital pathology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.