ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2021
Plasma-metabolite-based machine learning is a promising diagnostic approach for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma investigation.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Support Vector Machine Models for Cancer Detection and Related Clinical Applications Using Omics and Omics-Adjacent Data: A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in multi-omics for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic perspectives.Protein & cell · 2026Review
- Resolution-Adaptive Binning Enhances Machine Learning Modeling by Interbatch and Multiplatform Orbitrap-Based Shotgun Mass Spectrometry Data Integration.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Salivary metabolic profile landscape for gastric cancer screening: a metabolomic approach.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Analysis of the associations between DNA methylation and clinical features reveals the potential oncogenic effect of CFAP52 in esophageal squamous cell cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Identification of serum metabolite biomarkers and metabolic reprogramming mechanisms to predict recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From Data to Cure: A Comprehensive Exploration of Multi-omics Data Analysis for Targeted Therapies.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Indolelactic acid as a potential metabolic biomarker for diagnosing gout.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Integrated machine learning developed a prognosis-related gene signature to predict prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Metabolomic profiling of dengue infection: unraveling molecular signatures by LC-MS/MS and machine learning models.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Article
- Construction and validation of serum Metabolic Risk Score for early warning of malignancy in esophagus.iScience · 2024Article
- Integrating omics data and machine learning techniques for precision detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: evaluating single biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Discovering metabolic vulnerability using spatially resolved metabolomics for antitumor small molecule-drug conjugates development as a precise cancer therapy strategy.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Article
- Review
- Small molecule metabolites: discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Identification of m6a-related signature genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by machine learning method.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Global research trends of artificial intelligence applied in esophageal carcinoma: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2022)Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a diagnostic strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that combines plasma metabolomics with machine learning algorithms. Plasma-based untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed with samples derived from 88 ESCC patients and 52 healthy controls. The dataset was split into a training set and a test set. After identification of differential metabolites in training set, single-metabolite-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multiple-metabolite-based machine learning models were used to distinguish between ESCC patients and healthy controls. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to investigate the prognostic significance of the plasma metabolites. Finally, twelve differential plasma metabolites (six up-regulated and six down-regulated) were annotated. The predictive performance of the six most prevalent diagnostic metabolites through the diagnostic models in the test set were as follows: arachidonic acid (accuracy: 0.887), sebacic acid (accuracy: 0.867), indoxyl sulfate (accuracy: 0.850), phosphatidylcholine (PC) (14:0/0:0) (accuracy: 0.825), deoxycholic acid (accuracy: 0.773), and trimethylamine N-oxide (accuracy: 0.653). The prediction accuracies of the machine learning models in the test set were partial least-square (accuracy: 0.947), random forest (accuracy: 0.947), gradient boosting machine (accuracy: 0.960), and support vector machine (accuracy: 0.980). Additionally, survival analysis demonstrated that acetoacetic acid was an unfavorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR): 1.752), while PC (14:0/0:0) (HR: 0.577) was a favorable prognostic factor for ESCC. This study devised an innovative strategy for ESCC diagnosis by combining plasma metabolomics with machine learning algorithms and revealed its potential to become a novel screening test for ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.