Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513127›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2021

Plasma-metabolite-based machine learning is a promising diagnostic approach for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma investigation.

Zhongjian Chen, Xiancong Huang, Yun Gao, Su Zeng, Weimin Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhongjian ChenLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Drug Metabolism, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xiancong HuangThe Cancer Research Institute, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Yun GaoThe Cancer Research Institute, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Su ZengLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Drug Metabolism, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Weimin MaoThe Cancer Research Institute, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a diagnostic strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that combines plasma metabolomics with machine learning algorithms. Plasma-based untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed with samples derived from 88 ESCC patients and 52 healthy controls. The dataset was split into a training set and a test set. After identification of differential metabolites in training set, single-metabolite-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multiple-metabolite-based machine learning models were used to distinguish between ESCC patients and healthy controls. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to investigate the prognostic significance of the plasma metabolites. Finally, twelve differential plasma metabolites (six up-regulated and six down-regulated) were annotated. The predictive performance of the six most prevalent diagnostic metabolites through the diagnostic models in the test set were as follows: arachidonic acid (accuracy: 0.887), sebacic acid (accuracy: 0.867), indoxyl sulfate (accuracy: 0.850), phosphatidylcholine (PC) (14:0/0:0) (accuracy: 0.825), deoxycholic acid (accuracy: 0.773), and trimethylamine N-oxide (accuracy: 0.653). The prediction accuracies of the machine learning models in the test set were partial least-square (accuracy: 0.947), random forest (accuracy: 0.947), gradient boosting machine (accuracy: 0.960), and support vector machine (accuracy: 0.980). Additionally, survival analysis demonstrated that acetoacetic acid was an unfavorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR): 1.752), while PC (14:0/0:0) (HR: 0.577) was a favorable prognostic factor for ESCC. This study devised an innovative strategy for ESCC diagnosis by combining plasma metabolomics with machine learning algorithms and revealed its potential to become a novel screening test for ESCC.

Indexed as

DiagnosticEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)Machine learningMetabolomicsPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID34513127
PMCPMC8424362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.