Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513080›Full record

ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2021

Accelerated Recovery Program for Patients with Polysegmental Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.

A A Kalinin, V Yu Goloborodko, V V Shepelev, Yu Ya Pestryakov, M Yu Biryuchkov, E E Satardinova, V A Byvaltsev

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in elderly patients following multi-level posterior lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A A KalininAssociate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia; Neurosurgeon, Neurosurgery Center, Road Clinical Hospital, 10 Botkin St., Irkutsk, 664005, Russia.
V Yu GoloborodkoHead of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation No.12.
V V ShepelevDoctoral Student, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia.
Yu Ya PestryakovDoctoral Student, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia.
M Yu BiryuchkovProfessor, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery with Traumatology Course, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, 68 Maresyev St., Aktobe, 030019, Kazakhstan.
E E SatardinovaAssociate Professor, Department of Reflexotherapy and Cosmetology, Irkutsk State Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, 100 Yubileyny Microdistrict, Irkutsk, 664049, Russia.
V A ByvaltsevProfessor, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia; Chief of the Neurosurgery Center, Road Clinical Hospital, 10 Botkin St., Irkutsk, 664005, Russia; Professor, Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, 100 Yubileyny Microdistrict, Irkutsk, 664049, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 53 patients who underwent two-level transforaminal interbody fusion in the L Results: Patients under the accelerated recovery program were found to have a shorter duration of surgery and anesthesia, less blood loss, lower amounts of injected opioids, faster verticalization, and a reduced period of inpatient treatment (p<0.05 for all parameters). As compared to group 2, patients in group 1 had a lower level of pain in the surgery zone (p<0.05), better long-term indicators of the physical and psychological components of health (p<0.05), a lower number of anesthesia-associated adverse events (p<0.05), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (p<0.05). During the 90-day postoperative observation, four patients of group 2 (13.8%) were urgently referred to a medical institution for additional medical care. Conclusion: The accelerated recovery program for two-level interbody fusion showed its safety and high clinical efficiency in the treatment of patients with polysegmental degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. The program can be used in any center for spine surgery where effective interaction between polyvalent medical and nursing teams is maintained.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaccelerated recovery after surgeryERASfast-track surgerylumbar spineminimally invasive spinal surgerymultilevel degenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID34513080
PMCPMC8353713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.