ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2021
Search for Effective Serum Tumor Markers for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Hepatitis C.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis and of clinical values of 11 blood biomarkers, such as AFP, DCP, and GP73 for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of Glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Serum Midkine as a Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Response and Prognostication.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Intratumoral PD-1Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Targeting Glypican-3 for Liver Cancer Therapy: Clinical Applications and Detection Methods.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Review
- Review
- Expression and diagnostic value of abnormal prothrombin and osteopontin in hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Diagnostic value of Midkine and AFP in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Methylated SEPT9 combined with AFP and PIVKA-II is effective for the detection of HCC in high-risk population.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Extrahepatic Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in multi-omics research on viral hepatitis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: There were observed 55 patients with chronic hepatitis C in the stage of liver cirrhosis with a verified diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The control group consisted of 55 patients with chronic hepatitis C at the stage of liver cirrhosis without hepatocellular carcinoma, comparable to the experimental group in terms of basic clinical profile. The following tumor markers were estimated in both groups: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alpha-fetoprotein-L3 (AFP-L3), annexin A2 (ANXA2), heparin-binding growth factor Midkine (MDK), glypican-3 (GPC3), des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP, PIVKA-II), dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1), osteopontin (OPN), and Golgi protein 73 (GP73). There were also evaluated such indices as diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio of a positive test, the possible correlation between alpha-fetoprotein and other tumor markers. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated at the 95% confidence interval. Results: The greatest sensitivity was revealed when using heparin-binding growth factor, annexin A2, osteopontin. Alpha-fetoprotein, alpha-fetoprotein-L3, glypican-3, des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, dickkopf-related protein 1 had the best specificity. AUC>0.75 was found in annexin A2, heparin-binding growth factor, glypican-3, des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, osteopontin, Golgi protein 73. The likelihood ratio of a positive test result was the highest for glypican-3. A significant correlation was found between alpha-fetoprotein and alpha-fetoprotein-L3, annexin A2, des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin. Conclusion: According to the aggregate indicators of diagnostic efficiency, heparin-binding growth factor, glypican-3, and osteopontin are the most promising tumor markers of those studied. When they are used, integral AUC values are above the average, the level of these tumor markers in the blood of patients with hepatocellular cancer does not correlate with alpha-fetoprotein. They are applicable for diagnosing liver cancer in AFP-negative patients. The combined use of AFP + GPC3, AFP + OPN has already shown their advantages. However, the efficacy of the combination of AFP + MDK, GPC3 + OPN has not been determined yet; therefore, significance of the combined use of these tumor markers in the diagnosis of liver cancer should be investigated in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.