Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513001›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2021

A randomized-controlled trial of community-based transdiagnostic psychotherapy for veterans and internally displaced persons in Ukraine.

Sergiy Bogdanov, Jura Augustinavicius, Judith K Bass, Kristie Metz, Stephanie Skavenski, Namrita S Singh, Quincy Moore, Emily E Haroz, Jeremy Kane, Ben Doty and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Scalable interventions for refugees.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sergiy BogdanovCenter for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-3453
Jura AugustinaviciusDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-2027
Judith K BassDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Kristie MetzDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Stephanie SkavenskiDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Namrita S SinghDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Quincy MooreDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Emily E HarozDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-4925
Jeremy KaneDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-3840
Ben DotyDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Laura MurrayDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Paul BoltonDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

Global Mental Health Training ProgramT32MH103210 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Karen Bass, Sarah Sutherlin-McIvor Murray · 2015 to 2026
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited research on community-based mental health interventions in former Soviet countries despite different contextual factors from where most research has been conducted. Ongoing military conflict has resulted in many displaced persons and veterans and their families with high burdens of mental health problems. Lack of community-based services and poor uptake of existing psychiatric services led to the current trial to determine the effectiveness of the common elements treatment approach (CETA) on anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS) among conflict affected adults in Ukraine.

methodsWe conducted a three-armed randomized-controlled trial of CETA delivered in its standard form (8-12 sessions), a brief form (five-sessions), and a wait-control condition. Eligible participants were displaced adults, army veterans and their adult family members with elevated depression and/or PTS and impaired functioning. Treatment was delivered by community-based providers trained in both standard and brief CETA. Outcome data were collected monthly.

resultsThere were 302 trial participants (

conclusionsStandard CETA is more effective than brief CETA, but brief CETA also had significant effects compared with wait-controls. Given demonstrated effectiveness, CETA could be scaled up as an effective community-based approach.

Indexed as

Brief CETACETAcommunity-basedmental healthmilitary conflictpsychotherapytrial

Identifiers

PMID34513001
PMCPMC8392687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.