Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34513000›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2021

The Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention with peer support in rural Zimbabwean women: a mixed methods pilot evaluation.

Shamiso Fernando, Tim Brown, Kavita Datta, Dzivaidzo Chidhanguro, Naume V Tavengwa, Jaya Chandna, Epiphania Munetsi, Lloyd Dzapasi, Chandiwana Nyachowe, Batsirai Mutasa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shamiso FernandoZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tim BrownQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Kavita DattaQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dzivaidzo ChidhanguroZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Naume V TavengwaZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jaya ChandnaZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Epiphania MunetsiAfrican Mental Health Research Initiative (AMARI), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lloyd DzapasiAfrican Mental Health Research Initiative (AMARI), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Chandiwana NyachoweMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Batsirai MutasaZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Bernard ChasekwaZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Robert NtoziniZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Dixon ChibandaAfrican Mental Health Research Initiative (AMARI), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Andrew J PrendergastZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-7992
Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research · ZWQueen Mary University of London · GBMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZW

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R019436/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a large treatment gap for common mental disorders in rural areas of low-income countries. We tested the Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention delivered by village health workers (VHWs) in rural Zimbabwe.

methodsRural women identified with depression in a previous trial received weekly home-based problem-solving therapy from VHWs for 6 weeks, and joined a peer-support group. Depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Shona Symptom Questionnaire (SSQ). Acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The proportion of women with depression pre- and post-intervention was compared using McNemar's test.

resultsTen VHWs delivered problem-solving therapy to 27 women of mean age 33 years; 25 completed six sessions. Women valued an established and trustful relationship with their VHW, which ensured confidentiality and prevented gossip, and reported finding individual problem-solving therapy beneficial. Peer-support meetings provided space to share problems, solutions and skills. The proportion of women with depression or suicidal ideation on the EPDS declined from 68% to 12% [difference 56% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.0-85.0);

conclusionVHW-delivered problem-solving therapy and peer-support was acceptable and showed promising results in this pilot evaluation, leading to quantitative and qualitative improvements in mental health among rural Zimbabwean women. Scale-up of the Friendship Bench in rural areas would help close the treatment gap for common mental disorders.

Indexed as

Africacommunity health workersDepressionproblem-solving therapytask sharing

Identifiers

PMID34513000
PMCPMC8392686
OpenAlexW3196383527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.