Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512921›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Influence of brushing with natural dentifrices on color change: In vitro study.

Helena Dutra, Isabel Barbosa, João-Victor Câmara, Gisele Pereira

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helena DutraMSc, Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Isabel BarbosaPhD, Department of Restorative Detistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Campinas State University, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil.
João-Victor CâmaraMaster student, Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gisele PereiraAdjunct Professor, Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate MATERIAL AND

methodsFour dentifrices were used, one conventional Colgate Total 12 - Clean Mint (G1), and three natural, Contented Toothpaste with Organic and Natural Ingredients (G2); Dental Toothpaste (G3) and Aliv-Gaia Toothpaste (G4). Eighty bovine teeth were distributed in four experimental groups with 20 teeth each (n = 20). The buccal enamel surface of the teeth was subjected to brushing, with the related dentifrices of each group, for 2.13 seconds three times a day, with an electric brush Oral B 5000 Professional Care. Before and after brushing, color measurement tests with a spectrophotometer were performed. The color variation was calculated using the formula ΔE = [(ΔL *) 2+ (Δa *) 2+ (Δb *)2] 1/2. The results obtained were tabulated and submitted to the Kruskal Wallis non-parametric test.

resultsThe color change (ΔE) observed was 7.551 and p-value equal to 0.056, determining that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, qualitative tests showed the clearing of all experimental groups, G3 with the greatest change, followed by G2, G1 and G4.

conclusionsThe evaluated dentifrices were not able to promote color change.

Identifiers

PMID34512921
PMCPMC8412801
OpenAlexW3188812958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.