Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512898›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2021

Paradigm shift in gastrointestinal surgery - combating sarcopenia with prehabilitation: Multimodal review of clinical and scientific data.

Frederick H Koh, Jason Mw Chua, Joselyn Lj Tan, Fung-Joon Foo, Winson J Tan, Sharmini S Sivarajah, Leonard Ming Li Ho, Bin-Tean Teh, Min-Hoe Chew

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Preoperative walking speed and surgical aspects as predictors of early ambulation after abdominal cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederick H KohDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore. frederickkohhx@gmail.com.
Jason Mw ChuaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore 138673, Singapore.
Joselyn Lj TanInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore 138673, Singapore.
Fung-Joon FooDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Winson J TanDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Sharmini S SivarajahDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Leonard Ming Li HoDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Bin-Tean TehDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Min-Hoe ChewDivision of Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the prognostic significance of sarcopenia in surgical patients as an independent predictor of postoperative complications and outcomes. These included an increased risk of total complications, major complications, re-admissions, infections, severe infections, 30 d mortality, longer hospital stay and increased hospitalization expenditures. A program to enhance recovery after surgery was meant to address these complications; however, compliance to the program since its introduction has been less than ideal. Over the last decade, the concept of prehabilitation, or "pre-surgery rehabilitation", has been discussed. The presurgical period represents a window of opportunity to boost and optimize the health of an individual, providing a compensatory "buffer" for the imminent reduction in physiological reserve post-surgery. Initial results have been promising. We review the literature to critically review the utility of prehabilitation, not just in the clinical realm, but also in the scientific realm, with a resource management point-of-view.

Indexed as

FrailtyGastrointestinal surgeryPrehabilitationSarcopeniaSurgeryValue

Identifiers

PMID34512898
PMCPMC8394378
OpenAlexW3196209621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.