Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512525›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Where We Mentalize: Main Cortical Areas Involved in Mentalization.

Matteo Monticelli, Pietro Zeppa, Marco Mammi, Federica Penner, Antonio Melcarne, Francesco Zenga, Diego Garbossa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inter-brain coupling tracks emotional co-regulation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural circuit basis of pathological anxiety.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo MonticelliNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Pietro ZeppaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Marco MammiNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Federica PennerNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Antonio MelcarneNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Francesco ZengaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Turin University, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When discussing "mentalization," we refer to a very special ability that only humans and few species of great apes possess: the ability to think about themselves and to represent in their mind their own mental state, attitudes, and beliefs and those of others. In this review, a summary of the main cortical areas involved in mentalization is presented. A thorough literature search using PubMed MEDLINE database was performed. The search terms "cognition," "metacognition," "mentalization," "direct electrical stimulation," "theory of mind," and their synonyms were combined with "prefrontal cortex," "temporo-parietal junction," "parietal cortex," "inferior frontal gyrus," "cingulate gyrus," and the names of other cortical areas to extract relevant published papers. Non-English publications were excluded. Data were extracted and analyzed in a qualitative manner. It is the authors' belief that knowledge of the neural substrate of metacognition is essential not only for the "neuroscientist" but also for the "practical neuroscientist" (i.e., the neurosurgeon), in order to better understand the pathophysiology of mentalizing dysfunctions in brain pathologies, especially those in which integrity of cortical areas or white matter connectivity is compromised. Furthermore, in the context of neuro-oncological surgery, understanding the anatomical structures involved in the theory of mind can help the neurosurgeon obtain a wider and safer resection. Though beyond of the scope of this paper, an important but unresolved issue concerns the long-range white matter connections that unify these cortical areas and that may be themselves involved in neural information processing.

Indexed as

cortical areasfunctional anatomyhuman brainmentalizationpractical neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID34512525
PMCPMC8432612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.