Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Reinforcement Learning to Improve Image-Guidance of Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.

Laila Muizniece, Adrian Bertagnoli, Ahmed Qureshi, Aya Zeidan, Aditi Roy, Marica Muffoletto, Oleg Aslanidi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laila MuiznieceSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian BertagnoliSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed QureshiSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aya ZeidanSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aditi RoySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marica MuffolettoSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oleg AslanidiSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and currently affects more than 650,000 people in the United Kingdom alone. Catheter ablation (CA) is the only AF treatment with a long-term curative effect as it involves destroying arrhythmogenic tissue in the atria. However, its success rate is suboptimal, approximately 50% after a 2-year follow-up, and this high AF recurrence rate warrants significant improvements. Image-guidance of CA procedures have shown clinical promise, enabling the identification of key patient anatomical and pathological (such as fibrosis) features of atrial tissue, which require ablation. However, the latter approach still suffers from a lack of functional information and the need to interpret structures in the images by a clinician. Deep learning plays an increasingly important role in biomedicine, facilitating efficient diagnosis and treatment of clinical problems. This study applies deep reinforcement learning in combination with patient imaging (to provide structural information of the atria) and image-based modelling (to provide functional information) to design patient-specific CA strategies to guide clinicians and improve treatment success rates. To achieve this, patient-specific 2D left atrial (LA) models were derived from late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI scans of AF patients and were used to simulate patient-specific AF scenarios. Then a reinforcement Q-learning algorithm was created, where an ablating agent moved around the 2D LA, applying CA lesions to terminate AF and learning through feedback imposed by a reward policy. The agent achieved 84% success rate in terminating AF during training and 72% success rate in testing. Finally, AF recurrence rate was measured by attempting to re-initiate AF in the 2D atrial models after CA with 11% recurrence showing a great improvement on the existing therapies. Thus, reinforcement Q-learning algorithms can predict successful CA strategies from patient MRI data and help to improve the patient-specific guidance of CA therapy.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationdeep learningpatient imagingreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID34512401
PMCPMC8424004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.