ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
Reinforcement Learning to Improve Image-Guidance of Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Predicting Early recurrence of atrial fibrilation post-catheter ablation using machine learning techniques.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of machine learning algorithms and their application in geriatric medicine: present and future.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Review
- Value of Imaging in the Non-Invasive Prediction of Recurrence after Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Up-to-Date Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Wearable Devices Combined with Artificial Intelligence-A Future Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and currently affects more than 650,000 people in the United Kingdom alone. Catheter ablation (CA) is the only AF treatment with a long-term curative effect as it involves destroying arrhythmogenic tissue in the atria. However, its success rate is suboptimal, approximately 50% after a 2-year follow-up, and this high AF recurrence rate warrants significant improvements. Image-guidance of CA procedures have shown clinical promise, enabling the identification of key patient anatomical and pathological (such as fibrosis) features of atrial tissue, which require ablation. However, the latter approach still suffers from a lack of functional information and the need to interpret structures in the images by a clinician. Deep learning plays an increasingly important role in biomedicine, facilitating efficient diagnosis and treatment of clinical problems. This study applies deep reinforcement learning in combination with patient imaging (to provide structural information of the atria) and image-based modelling (to provide functional information) to design patient-specific CA strategies to guide clinicians and improve treatment success rates. To achieve this, patient-specific 2D left atrial (LA) models were derived from late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI scans of AF patients and were used to simulate patient-specific AF scenarios. Then a reinforcement Q-learning algorithm was created, where an ablating agent moved around the 2D LA, applying CA lesions to terminate AF and learning through feedback imposed by a reward policy. The agent achieved 84% success rate in terminating AF during training and 72% success rate in testing. Finally, AF recurrence rate was measured by attempting to re-initiate AF in the 2D atrial models after CA with 11% recurrence showing a great improvement on the existing therapies. Thus, reinforcement Q-learning algorithms can predict successful CA strategies from patient MRI data and help to improve the patient-specific guidance of CA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.