Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512296›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task.

Carly A Lasagna, Stephan F Taylor, Taraz G Lee, Saige Rutherford, Tristan Greathouse, Pan Gu, Ivy F Tso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carly A LasagnaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Stephan F TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Taraz G LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Saige RutherfordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Tristan GreathouseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Pan GuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Ivy F TsoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Disrupted eye gaze perception as a biobehavioral marker of social dysfunction: An RDoC investigationR01MH122491 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TSO, IVY FEI · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Neural mechanisms of eye gaze perception in schizophreniaK23MH108823 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TSO, IVY FEI · 2016 to 2020
$894k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108823NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a powerful form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation capable of suppressing cortical excitability for up to 50 min. A growing number of studies have applied cTBS to the visual cortex in human subjects to investigate the neural dynamics of visual processing, but few have specifically examined its effects on central vision, which has crucial implications for safety and inference on downstream cognitive effects. The present study assessed the safety of offline, neuronavigated cTBS to V2 by examining its effects on central vision performance. In this single-blind, randomized sham-controlled, crossover study, 17 healthy adults received cTBS (at 80% active motor threshold) and sham to V2 1-2 weeks apart. Their central vision (≤8°) was tested at 1-min (T1) and again at 50-min (T50) post-stimulation. Effects of condition (cTBS vs. sham) and time (T1 vs. T50) on accuracy and reaction time were examined using Bayes factor. Bayes factor results suggested that cTBS did not impair stimulus detection over the entire central visual field nor subfields at T1 or T50. Our results offer the first explicit evidence supporting that cTBS applied to V2 does not create blind spots in the central visual field in humans during a simple detection task. Any subtler changes to vision and downstream visual perception should be investigated in future studies.

Indexed as

safetytheta burst stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationV2visionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34512296
PMCPMC8429821
OpenAlexW3198772498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.