Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34512110›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2021

Fog-based healthcare systems: A systematic review.

Zahra Ahmadi, Mostafa Haghi Kashani, Mohammad Nikravan, Ebrahim Mahdipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Digital health-high tech or high touch?Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023
    Article
  8. Towards effective offloading mechanisms in fog computing.Multimedia tools and applications · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahra AhmadiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa Haghi KashaniDepartment of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad NikravanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ebrahim MahdipourDepartment of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healthcare system aims to provide a reliable and organized solution to enhance the health of human society. Studying the history of patients can help physicians to consider patients' needs in healthcare system designing and offering service, which leads to an increase in patient satisfaction. Therefore, healthcare is becoming a growing contesting market. With this significant growth in healthcare systems, such challenges as huge data volume, response time, latency, and security vulnerability are raised. Therefore, fog computing, as a well-known distributed architecture, could help to solve such challenges. In fog computing architecture, processing components are placed between the end devices and cloud components, and they execute applications. This architecture is suitable for such applications as healthcare systems that need a real-time response and low latency. In this paper, a systematic review of available approaches in the field of fog-based healthcare systems is proposed; the challenges of its application in healthcare are explored, classified, and discussed. First, the fog computing approaches in healthcare are categorized into three main classes: communication, application, and resource/service. Then, they are discussed and compared based on their tools, evaluation methods, and evaluation metrics. Finally, based on observations, some open issues and challenges are highlighted for further studies in fog-based healthcare.

Indexed as

eHealthFog computingHealthcareSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34512110
PMCPMC8418296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.