ArticleJournal of inflammation research2021
Dynamic Changes of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Close Contacts.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of Immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 in a Community-Based Model of Care during the Fourth Wave of COVID-19 Outbreak in Ho Chi Minh City.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- Durability and extent of protection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among patients with COVID-19 in Metro Manila, Philippines.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClose contacts of individuals with COVID-19 may directly gain immunity against SARS-CoV-2 despite lacking a detectable infection. This study examined SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies levels based on gender, age, and exposure source in close contacts of individuals with COVID-19 and compared antibody levels to patients with an asymptomatic or symptomatic COVID-19 infection.
methodsTwo patients had confirmed COVID-19 infections at a community hospital in Qiongzhong, Hainan province. Contact tracing identified all individuals in the community who had been exposed to the two patients during the 14 days before their diagnoses. Close contacts quarantined for 14 days, underwent two SARS-CoV-2 tests, and were screened for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies at 7 and 12 weeks after the end of quarantine. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels for the close contacts were compared to those for patients with an asymptomatic or symptomatic COVID-19 infection at 7 and 12 weeks after their diagnoses.
resultsContact tracing identified 10,573 individuals in the community, including 360 (3.4%) close contacts. At 7 weeks, 30 (8.33%) close contacts were positive for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (IgG, n = 26 [7.22%]; IgM, n = 4 [1.11%]), which were lower than the proportion of patients with an asymptomatic (IgG, 100% [12/12]) or symptomatic (IgG, 93.6% [44/47]) COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM antibody levels were significantly higher in close contacts who were exposed through a relative compared to a doctor-patient relationship (
conclusionImmune protection conferred by close contact is short term and unlikely to contribute to herd immunity. There remains an unmet public health need for mass vaccination of populations to increase levels of protective antibodies and achieve and maintain herd immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.