Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511957›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2021

Aesthetic Delusions: An Investigation into the Role of Rapid Visual Adaptation in Aesthetic Practice.

Kate Goldie, David Cumming, Daria Voropai, Afshin Mosahebi, Sabrina Guillen Fabi, Claus-Christian Carbon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Facial Overfilled Syndrome: A Narrative Clinical Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kate GoldieEuropean Medical Aesthetics, London, UK.
David CummingOxford AI Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Daria VoropaiEuropean Medical Aesthetics, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5689-1381
Afshin MosahebiDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sabrina Guillen FabiCosmetic Laser Dermatology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Claus-Christian CarbonDepartment of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3446-9347
Science Oxford · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Bamberg · DEUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, the process of adaptation in the setting of aesthetic medicine has not been investigated. The combination of complex advanced feedback in the current intense social media milieu, in conjunction with easily accessible and effective aesthetic treatments, has produced pockets of overtreated patients and over-zealous practitioners. We examine whether aesthetic assessments of attractiveness and what appears natural can be distorted by the cognitive process of adaptation.

methodsForty-eight female participants were exposed to photographs of female faces in whom lip fullness had been strongly under- or over-exaggerated, while remaining within the bounds of natural appearing lips. Before and after evaluation of the exaggerated images, participants were asked to rate an alternative set of faces in terms of attractiveness (reflecting direct assessment of effective beauty impression) and naturalness (reflecting indirect assessment of beauty norms). The evaluation set consisted of six base faces that had been digitally altered to create a systematically varying 11 step set of lip sizes from extremely thin, to the original version, to very full.

resultsSecond-order polynomial fits indicated clear shifts of the subjects' facial aesthetic assessments towards the specific lip fullness of the adaptors. In contrast, such adaptions were not found for ratings of face naturalness. In contrast to research demonstrating mathematical foundations and unchanging rules governing perceptions of beauty, we show that simple viewing of exaggerated feature morphologies can rapidly result in recalibration of a person's assessment of attractiveness.

conclusionThis paper provides evidence that facial attractiveness is fluid, and that there are psychological mechanisms that cause an aesthetic bias. Over-exposure to exaggerated features can lead to significant changes to a person's ideas of attractiveness.

Indexed as

adaptationaesthetic assessmentsattractivenessfacial attractivenessflexibilitynormstandards

Identifiers

PMID34511957
PMCPMC8424431
OpenAlexW3193966482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.