Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511887›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

Preference for and Efficacy of a PrEP Decision Aid for Women with Substance Use Disorders.

Jaimie Meyer, Carolina Price, DeShana Tracey, Laurel Sharpless, Yue Song, Lynn Madden, Glyn Elwyn, Frederick Altice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaimie MeyerYale School of Medicine, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-385X
Carolina PriceYale School of Medicine, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.
DeShana TraceyYale School of Medicine, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.
Laurel SharplessYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4264-8553
Yue SongYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lynn MaddenYale School of Medicine, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-3938
Glyn ElwynThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA.
Frederick AlticeYale School of Medicine, AIDS Program, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-693X

Funding

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2017080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with substance use disorders (SUDs) are a key population for HIV prevention with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), though uptake is limited by awareness of PrEP, misestimation of personal HIV risk, and minimally integrated HIV prevention and addiction treatment services. Patient-centered decision aids (DA) could address these barriers to PrEP, but no extant DA for PrEP has been published, including for women with SUDs.

methodsWe developed a patient-centered PrEP DA for women in addiction treatment. In a pilot randomized preference trial, we compared the DA to enhanced standard of care (eSOC) providing standardized information. The primary outcome was opting to receive more information through the DA; we also assessed the impact of the DA on PrEP decisional preference and PrEP uptake over 12 months.

resultsA total of 164 enrolled participants (DA: 83; eSOC: 81) were similar in terms of HIV risk and demographics, which are representative of women in addiction treatment programs nationally, and most (92%) had opioid use disorder. Half of participants were PrEP eligible, though 37% underestimated their personal HIV risk. Independent correlates of selecting the PrEP DA relative to eSOC included higher alcohol use severity (aOR 4.13, 95% CI 1.05-16.28,

conclusionHalf of the women selected to use the DA, and those who did significantly increased their engagement in the HIV prevention cascade through increased interest in and initiation of PrEP. Future iterations should accelerate the HIV prevention cascade for women with SUDs by integrating PrEP decision aids into existing addiction treatment services and actively linking women to PrEP.

Indexed as

decision aidsPrEPsubstance use disorderswomen

Identifiers

PMID34511887
PMCPMC8420782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.