Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511821›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Percutaneous Drainage in Hepatic Hydatidosis-The PAIR Technique: Concept, Technique, and Results.

Mohammad S Khuroo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PercutaneousWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Hydatidosis with Atypical Localization: Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hourglass Sign in Liver Hydatid Disease: Significance and Therapeutic Implications.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Primary pelvicWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mohammad S KhurooSher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over decades, surgery has been the only accepted mode of treatment for liver hydatid cysts. It had been a surgical dogma for a long that hydatid disease is an absolute contraindication for needle puncture/aspiration as it can cause anaphylaxis, death, and dissemination. We envisaged prospectively perform percutaneous drainage as a primary form of treatment for hepatic hydatidosis. Through extensive and very careful experimentation, we proved that aspiration of hydatid cysts can be performed safely and is the ideal way to manage a subset of patients with hydatid cysts in the liver. The patient and cyst characteristics good and not good for percutaneous drainage were carefully selected. The procedure of percutaneous drainage of hepatic hydatid cysts involves four sequential steps as defined in the alphabets of the title

Indexed as

cystic echinococcosisE. granulosus, Echinococcus granulosushydatid cysthydatid diseasePAIR, denoting puncture (P), Aspiration (A), Instillation (I), and Reaspiration (R)pair techniquepercutaneous drainageSKIMS, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences

Identifiers

PMID34511821
PMCPMC8414317
OpenAlexW3165683756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.