Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511820›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Quantification of Liver Fat by MRI-PDFF Imaging in Patients with Suspected Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Correlation with Metabolic Syndrome, Liver Function Test and Ultrasonography.

Gajanan A Rodge, Mahesh K Goenka, Usha Goenka, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Bhavik B Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MASLD In Children - A Distinct Phenotype?Current obesity reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gajanan A RodgeInstitute of Gastrosciences & Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Mahesh K GoenkaInstitute of Gastrosciences & Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Usha GoenkaDepartment of Clinical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Shivaraj AfzalpurkarInstitute of Gastrosciences & Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Bhavik B ShahInstitute of Gastrosciences & Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has emerged to be a promising tool in quantification of liver fat. Aim of this study was to quantify liver fat using MRI-PDFF in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to correlate it with the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), ultrasonography (USG) and liver function test (LFT).

methodsWe included 111 consecutive patients who were suspected to have NAFLD on the basis of clinical, laboratory or USG findings. A 3 Tesla Phillips MRI machine was used with a software named "mDixon Quant" for quantification of the liver fat.

resultsMRI-PDFF revealed hepatic steatosis grading as Grade 0 in 31 patients (28%), Grade I in 40 (36%), Grade II in 19 (17.1%) and Grade III in 21 patients (18.9%). MetS patients had higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) as compared to those without MetS (

conclusionMetS patients have higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) at MRI-PDFF as compared to those without MetS. Patients with advanced steatosis at MRI-PDFF had higher proportion of abnormal LFTs as compared to those with Grades 0 and I hepatic steatosis. There was a dis-correlation between MRI-PDFF and USG in the evaluation of NAFLD.

Indexed as

ALT, alanine transaminaseBMI, body mass indexCAP, controlled attenuation parameterHDL, high-density lipoproteinLFT, liver function testliver fat quantificationmetabolic syndromeMetS, metabolic syndromeMRI, magnetic resonance imagingMRI-PDFFMRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopyNAFLDNAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseNASHNASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitisPDFF, proton density fat fractionROI, region of interestULN, upper limit of normalUSG, ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34511820
PMCPMC8414318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.