ArticleTransportation research. Part A, Policy and practice2021
Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London.
Article in Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-commuting intentions during COVID-19 in Nanjing, China: A hybrid latent class modeling approach.Cities (London, England) · 2023Article
- Using mobile phone big data to discover the spatial patterns of rural migrant workers' return to work in China's three urban agglomerations in the post-COVID-19 era.Environment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science · 2023Article
- Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility.Transportation · 2023Article
- Causal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily ridership of public bicycle sharing in Seoul.Sustainable cities and society · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on online grocery shopping discussion and behavior reflected from Google Trends and geotagged tweets.Computational urban science · 2023Article
- Article
- Short- and long-term effects of COVID-19 on bicycle sharing usage.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2022Article
- Data analytics during pandemics: a transportation and location planning perspective.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- Riding the wave: Predicting the use of the bike-sharing system in Barcelona before and during COVID-19.Sustainable cities and society · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Era on Residential Property Features: Pilot Studies in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Wishful thinking? Addressing the long-term implications of COVID-19 for transport in Nigeria.Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment · 2022Article
- Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic led to the adoption of many unprecedented measures to slow down the spread of the virus. Such measures have greatly impacted the entire transportation system and individuals' travel behaviors. This paper evaluates the impacts of COVID-19 related policies, including the lockdown and the first lockdown ease on the usage of public bicycle share in London using interrupted time series approach. Our results indicate that the UK's lockdown led to an immediate decrease in the London Cycle Hire (LCH) usage, while the first lockdown ease had no statistically significant immediate impacts. Moreover, during the lockdown period, the LCH usage showed an increasing trend and the first lockdown ease led to a much larger increase rate. Such impacts vary by the trip characteristics (i.e., occurring period and trip duration). The morning peak trips and short duration trips maintained a lower usage level during the lockdown and the lockdown ease period. On the contrary, the number of other LCH trips were much larger than that in normal days. Furthermore, the impacts on the LCH stations near the rail stations, hospitals, and parks also varied differently. The LCH trips near the rail stations reduced more after the imposition of the lockdown policy while those near the hospitals reduced less. The LCH stations near the parks had a much higher increase rate during the lockdown and the lockdown ease period than the general level. Our results provide practical implications for the policy makers and operators of the public bicycle share system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.