Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511689›Full record

ArticleExpert systems2022

Review on COVID-19 diagnosis models based on machine learning and deep learning approaches.

Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri, Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar, Iyad Abu Doush, Mohammed A Awadallah, Ammar Kamal Abasi, Sharif Naser Makhadmeh, Osama Ahmad Alomari, Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem, Afzan Adam, Robertas Damasevicius and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. RADIC:A tool for diagnosing COVID-19 from chest CT and X-ray scans using deep learning and quad-radiomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Zaid Abdi Alkareem AlyasseriCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-9298
Mohammed Azmi Al-BetarArtificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC) Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-1791
Iyad Abu DoushComputing Department, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences American University of Kuwait Salmiya Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-0032
Mohammed A AwadallahArtificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC) Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-8946
Ammar Kamal AbasiArtificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC) Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0725-6167
Sharif Naser MakhadmehFaculty of Information Technology Middle East University Amman Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-7998
Osama Ahmad AlomariMLALP Research Group University of Sharjah Sharjah United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1135-5750
Karrar Hameed AbdulkareemCollege of Agriculture Al-Muthanna University Samawah Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7302-2049
Afzan AdamCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-1005
Robertas DamaseviciusFaculty of Applied Mathematics Silesian University of Technology Gliwice Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9990-1084
Mazin Abed MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology University of Anbar Anbar Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-8102
Raed Abu ZitarSorbonne Center of Artificial Intelligence Sorbonne University-Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates.
Ajman University · AEAl-Muthanna University · IQAmerican University of Kuwait · KWNational University of Malaysia · MYSilesian University of Technology · PLSorbonne Université · FRUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of Anbar · IQUniversity of Kufa · IQUniversity of Sharjah · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is the disease evoked by a new breed of coronavirus called the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, COVID-19 has become a pandemic by infecting more than 152 million people in over 216 countries and territories. The exponential increase in the number of infections has rendered traditional diagnosis techniques inefficient. Therefore, many researchers have developed several intelligent techniques, such as deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML), which can assist the healthcare sector in providing quick and precise COVID-19 diagnosis. Therefore, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the most recent DL and ML techniques for COVID-19 diagnosis. The studies are published from December 2019 until April 2021. In general, this paper includes more than 200 studies that have been carefully selected from several publishers, such as IEEE, Springer and Elsevier. We classify the research tracks into two categories: DL and ML and present COVID-19 public datasets established and extracted from different countries. The measures used to evaluate diagnosis methods are comparatively analysed and proper discussion is provided. In conclusion, for COVID-19 diagnosing and outbreak prediction, SVM is the most widely used machine learning mechanism, and CNN is the most widely used deep learning mechanism. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are the most widely used measurements in previous studies. Finally, this review paper will guide the research community on the upcoming development of machine learning for COVID-19 and inspire their works for future development. This review paper will guide the research community on the upcoming development of ML and DL for COVID-19 and inspire their works for future development.

Indexed as

2019‐nCoVCOVID‐19COVID‐19 datasetdeep learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34511689
PMCPMC8420483
OpenAlexW3184886727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.