Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511527›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2021

A mixed methods study of employers' and employees' evaluations of job seekers with a mental illness, disability, or of a cultural minority.

Tonje Fyhn, Vigdis Sveinsdottir, Silje E Reme, Gro M Sandal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tonje FyhnNORCE Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Vigdis SveinsdottirNORCE Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Silje E RemeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gro M SandalFaculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroups in society that are under-represented in the workforce encounter various barriers in the job-seeking process. Some of these barriers are found on the employer's side of the table.

objectiveThis study investigates supervisors' and employees' assessments of job seekers with different forms of disabilities, health issues, or with a minority background. It also investigates respondents' previous experience with such colleagues, and whether supervisor status affects their assessments.

methodsA survey was distributed among supervisors (n = 305) and employees (n = 925) using a vignette design with ten characters, inquiring about willingness to include such an employee in their work group. The vignettes described job seekers with either a mental illness, a physical disability or a cultural minority. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated for being assessed positively, using a vignette character describing a single mother as reference.

resultsVignette characters describing mental health issues and physical disabilities were less likely to be assessed positively than the reference case, except for the vignette describing audio impairment. Cultural minorities were assessed as positive, or more positively than the reference case. Supervisors and employees generally agreed in their assessments of vignette characters, and previous experience was consistently associated with a more positive assessment of the character in question. Various barriers to include the least favoured vignette characters were identified.

conclusionsAlthough some findings are promising with regard to increasing work participation for underrepresented groups, barriers pertaining to some of the vignette characters should be addressed in vocational rehabilitation efforts, as well as in organizations seeking to enhance equal opportunities and diversity.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMinority GroupsHumansInterior Design and FurnishingsRehabilitation, VocationalWorkforceDiversityequal opportunitiesevaluationselectionwork participation

Identifiers

PMID34511527
PMCPMC8543240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.