ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2021
Leadership in a time of crisis: Lessons learned from a pandemic.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lessons learned from crises in blood donation services: A systematic review of operational practices.Vox sanguinis · 2026Pooled it
- Hospital system resilience in the face of armed conflicts; a cross sectional study from two regions in Lebanon.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
- Between acceptance and change - a qualitative study about how leaders deal with bureaucracy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Reality of Healthcare Professionals in Leadership Positions at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Editorial: Self-care in healthcare workers for sustainable healthcare systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Assessing healthcare capacity crisis preparedness: development of an evaluation tool by a Canadian health authority.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Correlates of stress are interactive and not unidimensional: Evidence from U.S. college students early in the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2023Article
- The impact of leader safety communication on work engagement under pandemic: The effect of OBSE and anxiety based on COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Leadership and resilience in adversity: The impact of COVID-19 on radiography researchers and ways forward.Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2022Article
- Communicating health and science to the public: a role for scientists and academic researchers.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic is testing political leaders and healthcare systems worldwide, exposing deficits in crisis communication, leadership, preparedness and flexibility. Extraordinary situations abound, with global supply chains suddenly failing, media communicating contradictory information, and politics playing an increasingly bigger role in shaping each country's response to the crisis. The pandemic threatens not just our health but also our economy, liberty, and privacy. It challenges the speed at which we work, the quality of our research, and the effectiveness of communication within the scientific community. It can impose ethical dilemmas and emotional stress on healthcare workers. Nevertheless, the pandemic also provides an opportunity for healthcare organizations, leaders, and researchers to learn from their mistakes and to place their countries and institutions in a better position to face future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.