ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2021
Considerations for acute care staffing during a pandemic.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Challenges in healthcare facilities' response to past outbreaks: a systematic review of reviews.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Job insecurity and work passion among Central Sterile Supply Department nurses in the post-COVID-19 context.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Contrasting associations between wages and staffing levels of nurses and physicians in Swiss acute care hospitals.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- A Strategy for Surge Management: Senior Residents on the Admitting Frontlines.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2026Article
- [Hospital surge capacity volunteers in an emergency: a scoping review].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
- Article
- Theatre practitioners and organisational adaptive capacity in disaster response.Journal of perioperative practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Risk-adjusted policies to minimise perioperative staffing shortages during a pandemic: An agent-based simulation study.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Editorial: Self-care in healthcare workers for sustainable healthcare systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Healthcare Workforce Response to The Coronavirus Disease Outbreak in Daegu, Korea: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Survey.Infection & chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Article
- A "Pivotal Moment": Revisiting COVID-19 Frontline Nurse Experiences and Implications for the Profession.Clinical nurse specialist CNSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increase in interconnectedness of the global population has enabled a highly transmissible virus to spread rapidly around the globe in 2020. The COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic has led to physical, social, and economic repercussions of previously unseen proportions. Although recommendations for pandemic preparedness have been published in response to previous viral disease outbreaks, these guidelines are primarily based on expert opinion and few of them focus on acute care staffing issues. In this review, we discuss how working in acute care medicine during a pandemic can affect the physical and mental health of medical and nursing staff. We provide ideas for limiting staff shortages and creating surge capacity in acute care settings, and strategies for sustainability that can help hospitals maintain adequate staffing throughout their pandemic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.