SynthesisBMC surgery2021
A systematic review and meta-analysis of risks and benefits with breast reduction in the public healthcare system: priorities for further research.
Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04889469 (Indications for Breast Reduction in the Public Health Care System), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Indications for Breast Reduction in the Public Health Care System
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Outcomes After Breast Reduction: Do Racial Disparities Exist?Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional assessment of macromastia: linking breast morphology to quality of life.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Breast Reduction Practice Variation in Hamilton, Ontario: A Cost Analysis.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2025Article
- The Extent to Which Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fulfill Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient Healthcare Needs: A Mixed-Methods Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- The Role of Tranexamic Acid Use in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Review
- Timing of Pediatric Breast Reduction and Insurance Coverage: Single-institution Retrospective Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Quantification of Breast Volume According to age and BMI: A Three-Dimensional MRI Analysis of 400 Women.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Validation of the Short-Form 36 for Adolescents Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Swedish Normative Scores for the BREAST-Q Reduction/Mastopexy Module.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no consensus for when publicly funded breast reduction is indicated and recommendations in guidelines vary greatly, indicating a lack of evidence and unequal access. The primary aim of this review was to examine risks and benefits of breast reduction to treat breast hypertrophy. Secondary aims were to examine how the studies defined breast hypertrophy and indications for a breast reduction.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE All, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed when possible.
resultsFifteen articles were included; eight reporting findings from four randomised controlled trials, three non-randomised controlled studies, three case series, and one qualitative study. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Few of the studies defined breast hypertrophy. The studies showed significantly improved health-related quality of life and sexuality-related outcomes in patients who had undergone breast reduction compared with controls, as well as reduced depressive symptoms, levels of anxiety and pain. Most effect sizes exceeded the reported minimal important difference for the scale. Certainty of evidence for the outcomes above is low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕). Although four studies reported significantly improved physical function, the effect is uncertain (very low certainty of evidence, GRADE ⊕). None of the included studies reported data regarding work ability or sick leave. Three case series reported a 30-day mortality of zero. Reported major complications after breast reduction ranged from 2.4 to 14% and minor complications from 2.4 to 69%.
conclusionThere is a lack of high-quality studies evaluating the results of breast reduction. A breast reduction may have positive psychological and physical effects for women, but it is unclear which women benefit the most and which women should be offered a breast reduction in the public healthcare system. Several priorities for further research have been identified. PRE-REGISTRATION: The study is based on a Health Technology Assessment report, pre-registered and then published on the website of The Regional HTA Centre of Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.