Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511096›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2021

A systematic review and meta-analysis of risks and benefits with breast reduction in the public healthcare system: priorities for further research.

Emmelie Widmark-Jensen, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maud Eriksson, Håkan Hallberg, Christian Jepsen, Lennart Jivegård, Ann Liljegren, Max Petzold, Mikael Svensson, Fredrik Wärnberg and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04889469 (Indications for Breast Reduction in the Public Health Care System), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04889469 recruitingnot on this map

Indications for Breast Reduction in the Public Health Care System

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2021 to 2031Enrolled2,000ConditionsMammary Gland HyperplasiaArmsBreast reduction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative Outcomes After Breast Reduction: Do Racial Disparities Exist?Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of the Short-Form 36 for Adolescents Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmelie Widmark-JensenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Susanne BernhardssonRegion Västra Götaland, Research and Development Primary Health Care, Kungsgatan 12, SE-411 19, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-7678
Maud ErikssonHealth Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Röda Stråket 8, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Håkan HallbergDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christian JepsenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lennart JivegårdHealth Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Röda Stråket 8, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ann LiljegrenHealth Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Röda Stråket 8, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Max PetzoldHealth Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Röda Stråket 8, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mikael SvenssonHealth Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Röda Stråket 8, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1113-7478
Fredrik WärnbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-2435
Emma HanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden. emma.hansson.2@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-0881
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus for when publicly funded breast reduction is indicated and recommendations in guidelines vary greatly, indicating a lack of evidence and unequal access. The primary aim of this review was to examine risks and benefits of breast reduction to treat breast hypertrophy. Secondary aims were to examine how the studies defined breast hypertrophy and indications for a breast reduction.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE All, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed when possible.

resultsFifteen articles were included; eight reporting findings from four randomised controlled trials, three non-randomised controlled studies, three case series, and one qualitative study. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Few of the studies defined breast hypertrophy. The studies showed significantly improved health-related quality of life and sexuality-related outcomes in patients who had undergone breast reduction compared with controls, as well as reduced depressive symptoms, levels of anxiety and pain. Most effect sizes exceeded the reported minimal important difference for the scale. Certainty of evidence for the outcomes above is low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕). Although four studies reported significantly improved physical function, the effect is uncertain (very low certainty of evidence, GRADE ⊕). None of the included studies reported data regarding work ability or sick leave. Three case series reported a 30-day mortality of zero. Reported major complications after breast reduction ranged from 2.4 to 14% and minor complications from 2.4 to 69%.

conclusionThere is a lack of high-quality studies evaluating the results of breast reduction. A breast reduction may have positive psychological and physical effects for women, but it is unclear which women benefit the most and which women should be offered a breast reduction in the public healthcare system. Several priorities for further research have been identified. PRE-REGISTRATION: The study is based on a Health Technology Assessment report, pre-registered and then published on the website of The Regional HTA Centre of Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

Indexed as

MammaplastyQuality of LifeAnxietyDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansRisk AssessmentBreast hypertrophyBreast reductionEvidence-based medicinePlastic surgeryPrioritizingReduction mammaplasty

Identifiers

PMID34511096
PMCPMC8436537
OpenAlexW3201585214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.