Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511093›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Rates, costs, return to work and reoperation following spinal surgery in a workers' compensation cohort in New South Wales, 2010-2018: a cohort study using administrative data.

A M Lewin, M Fearnside, R Kuru, B P Jonker, J M Naylor, M Sheridan, I A Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

A M LewinSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW; Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, NSW, Liverpool, Australia. adriane.lewin@unsw.edu.au.
M FearnsideNeurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.
R KuruLake Macquarie Medical Centre, Gateshead, Australia.
B P JonkerRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Institute of Academic Surgery, NSW, Camperdown, Australia.
J M NaylorSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW; Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, NSW, Liverpool, Australia.
M SheridanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
I A HarrisSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW; Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, NSW, Liverpool, Australia.
Ingham Institute · AULake Macquarie Private Hospital · AULiverpool Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSouth Western Sydney Local Health District · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

State Insurance Regulatory Authority Spine surgery audit
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, elective spinal surgery rates in workers' compensation populations are high, as are reoperation rates, while return-to-work rates following spinal surgery are low. Little information is available from Australia. The aim of this study was to describe the rates, costs, return to work and reoperation following elective spinal surgery in the workers' compensation population in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used administrative data from the State Insurance Regulatory Authority, the government organisation responsible for regulating and administering workers' compensation insurance in NSW. These data cover all workers' compensation-insured workers in New South Wales (over 3 million workers/year). We identified a cohort of insured workers who underwent elective spinal surgery (fusion or decompression) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. People who underwent surgery for spinal fracture or dislocation, or who had sustained a traumatic brain injury were excluded. The main outcome measures were annual spinal surgery rates, cost of the surgical episode, cumulative costs (surgical, hospital, medical and physical therapy) to 2 years post-surgery, and reoperation and return-to-work rates 2 years post-surgery.

resultsThere were 9343 eligible claims (39.1 % fusion; 59.9 % decompression); claimants were predominantly male (75 %) with a mean age of 43 (range 18 to 75) years. Spinal surgery rates ranged from 15 to 29 surgeries per 100,000 workers per year, fell from 2011-12 to 2014-15 and rose thereafter. The average cost in Australian dollars for a surgical episode was $46,000 for a spinal fusion and $20,000 for a decompression. Two years post-fusion, only 19 % of people had returned to work at full capacity; 39 % after decompression. Nineteen percent of patients underwent additional spinal surgery within 2 years of the index surgery, to a maximum of 5 additional surgeries.

conclusionRates of workers' compensation-funded spinal surgery did not rise significantly during the study period, but reoperation rates are high and return-to-work rates are low in this population at 2 years post- surgery. In the context of the poor evidence base supporting lumbar fusion surgery, the high cost, increasing rates, and the increased likelihood of poor outcomes in the workers' compensation population, we question the value of this procedure in this setting.

Indexed as

Return to WorkWorkers' CompensationAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaCohort StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesReoperationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCostDecompressionElectiveFusionOutcomesReoperationReturn to workSpinalSpineSurgeryWorkers’ compensation

Identifiers

PMID34511093
PMCPMC8436510
OpenAlexW3200127813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.