Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511088›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Establishing evidence-based decision-making mechanism in a health eco-system and its linkages with health service coverage in 25 high-priority districts of Uttar Pradesh, India.

Ravi Prakash, Bidyadhar Dehury, Charu Yadav, Anand Bhushan Tripathi, Chhavi Sodhi, Huzaifa Bilal, N Vasanthakumar, Shajy Isac, B M Ramesh, James Blanchard and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ravi PrakashDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada. ravi.prakash@ihat.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-5789
Bidyadhar DehuryIndia Health Action Trust (IHAT), Lucknow, India.
Charu YadavIndia Health Action Trust (IHAT), Lucknow, India.
Anand Bhushan TripathiIndia Health Action Trust (IHAT), Lucknow, India.
Chhavi SodhiIndia Health Action Trust (IHAT), Lucknow, India.
Huzaifa BilalIndia Health Action Trust (IHAT), Lucknow, India.
N VasanthakumarDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada.
Shajy IsacDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada.
B M RameshDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada.
James BlanchardDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ties BoermaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, R070 Med Rehab Bldg, 771 McDermot Avenue, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Winnipeg, Canada.
India Health Action Trust · INUniversity of Manitoba · CAManitoba Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchievement of successful health outcomes depends on evidence-based programming and implementation of effective health interventions. Routine Health Management Information System is one of the most valuable data sets to support evidence-based programming, however, evidence on systemic use of routine monitoring data for problem-solving and improving health outcomes remain negligible. We attempt to understand the effects of systematic evidence-based review mechanism on improving health outcomes in Uttar Pradesh, India.

methodsData comes from decision-tracking system and routine health management information system for period Nov-2017 to Mar-2019 covering 6963 health facilities across 25 high-priority districts of the state. Decision-tracking data captured pattern of decisions taken, actions planned and completed, while the latter one provided information on service coverage outcomes over time. Three service coverage indicators, namely, pregnant women receiving 4 or more times ANC and haemoglobin testing during pregnancy, delivered at the health facility, and receive post-partum care within 48 h of delivery were used as outcomes. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted.

resultsTotal 412 decisions were taken during the study reference period and a majority were related to ante-natal care services (31%) followed by delivery (16%) and post-natal services (16%). About 21% decisions-taken were focused on improving data quality. By 1 year, 67% of actions planned based on these decisions were completed, 26% were in progress, and the remaining 7% were not completed. We found that, over a year, districts witnessing > 20 percentage-point increase in outcomes were also the districts with significantly higher action completion rates (> 80%) compared to the districts with < 10 percentage-point increase in outcomes having completion of action plans around 50-70%.

conclusionsFindings revealed a significantly higher improvement in coverage outcomes among the districts which used routine health management data to conduct monthly review meetings and had high actions completion rates. A data-based review-mechanisms could specifically identify programmatic gaps in service delivery leading to strategic decision making by district authorities to bridge the programmatic gaps. Going forward, establishing systematic evidence-based review platforms can be an important strategy to improve health outcomes and promote the use of routine health monitoring system data in any setting.

Indexed as

Management Information SystemsMaternal Health ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGovernment ProgramsHumansIndiaMedical AssistancePregnancyEvidence-based reviewHealth management information system, India

Identifiers

PMID34511088
PMCPMC8436494
OpenAlexW3200489165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.