Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34511083›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2021

The burden of recording and reporting health data in primary health care facilities in five low- and lower-middle income countries.

Amani Siyam, Por Ir, Dararith York, James Antwi, Freddie Amponsah, Ofelia Rambique, Carlos Funzamo, Aderemi Azeez, Leonard Mboera, Claud John Kumalija and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vehicle extrication in road traffic crashes: a descriptive analysis of an advanced medical rescue service in South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Amani SiyamHealth Workforce Department, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. siyama@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-4443
Por IrNational Institute of Public Health, No. 80, Samdach Penn Nouth Blvd (289), Sangkat Boeungkak 2, Tuol Kork District, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Dararith YorkDepartment of Planning and Health Information, Ministry of Health, No. 80, Samdach Penn Nouth Blvd (289), Sangkat Boeungkak 2, Tuol Kork District, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
James AntwiCentre for Health and Social Policy Research, West End University College, Ngleshie Amanfro, Accra, Ghana.
Freddie AmponsahGhana Health Service, Private Mail Bag, Ministries, Accra, Ghana.
Ofelia RambiqueNational Institute of Health, Vila de Marracuene, National Road, 3943, Maputo, Mozambique.
Carlos FunzamoWorld Health Organization Country Office, Rua Joseph Ki-zerbo 227, P.O. Box 377, Maputo, Mozambique.
Aderemi AzeezFederal Ministry of Health, Federal Secretariat, Phase III, Shehu Shagari Way, Central Business District, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Leonard MboeraSACIDS Foundation for One Health (SACIDS), Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), P.O. Box 3297, Chuo Kikuu, SUA, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Claud John KumalijaHealth Management Information System (HMIS), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Susan Fred RumishaThe National Institute for Medical Research, 3 Barack Obama Drive, P.O.Box 9653, 11101, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Irene MremiThe National Institute for Medical Research, 3 Barack Obama Drive, P.O.Box 9653, 11101, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ties BoermaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine-University of Manitoba, Room S113 - 750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.
Kathryn O'NeillIntegrated Health Services Department, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
National Institute for Medical Research · TZWorld Health Organization · CHFederal Ministry of Health · NGGhana Health Service · GHMinistry of Health · KHMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZNational Institute of Public Health · KHSouthern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance · TZUniversity of Manitoba · CAWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecording and reporting health data in facilities is the backbone of routine health information systems which provide data collected by health facility workers during service provision. Data is firstly collected in a register, to record patient health data and care process, and tallied into nationally designed reporting forms. While there is anecdotal evidence of large numbers of registers and reporting forms for primary health care (PHC) facilities, there are few systematic studies to document this potential burden on health workers. This multi-country study aimed to document the numbers of registers and reporting forms use at the PHC level and to estimate the time it requires for health workers to meet data demands.

methodsIn Cambodia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria and Tanzania, a desk review was conducted to document registers and reporting forms mandated at the PHC level. In each country, visits to 16 randomly selected public PHC facilities followed to assess the time spent on paper-based recording and reporting. Information was collected through self-reports of estimated time use by health workers, and observation of 1360 provider-patient interactions. Data was primarily collected in outpatient care (OPD), antenatal care (ANC), immunization (EPI), family planning (FP), HIV and Tuberculosis (TB) services.

resultCross-countries, the average number of registers was 34 (ranging between 16 and 48). Of those, 77% were verified in use and each register line had at least 20 cells to be completed per patient. The mean time spent on recording was about one-third the total consultation time for OPD, FP, ANC and EPI services combined. Cross-countries, the average number of monthly reporting forms was 35 (ranging between 19 and 52) of which 78% were verified in use. The estimated time to complete monthly reporting forms was 9 h (ranging between 4 to 15 h) per month per health worker.

conclusionsPHC facilities are mandated to use many registers and reporting forms pausing a considerable burden to health workers. Service delivery systems are expected to vary, however an imperative need remains to invest in international standards of facility-based registers and reporting forms, to ensure regular, comparable, quality-driven facility data collection and use.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PersonnelAmbulatory Care FacilitiesData CollectionFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansPregnancyPrimary Health CareHealth workerPublic PHC facilitiesRegistersReporting formsTime motion

Identifiers

PMID34511083
PMCPMC8436492
OpenAlexW3199278330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.