ReviewBMC health services research2021
The burden of recording and reporting health data in primary health care facilities in five low- and lower-middle income countries.
Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does a paper-based information system based on a human-centred design (PHISICC) reduce the time needed for reporting health data in Nigeria?BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- An evaluation of the Hawthorne effect in a clinical trial of trauma care in Ghana.World journal of surgery · 2024Trial
- Completeness of Paper-Based Clinical Records as a Dimension of Clinical Record Quality in Selected Public Hospitals in Mpumalanga and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design and content of health facility routine data recording and reporting forms for maternal, newborn, and child health: a scoping review of literature.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Does near-vision correction improve digital data entry accuracy? A simulated within-subject crossover study among community health workers in Malawi.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Transforming routine health data use in LMICs through modular, AI-supported automation: insights from Zimbabwe.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Scaling Phone-Based PROM Collection Across Low-Resource Settings: Learnings From MomCare, a Digital Pregnancy Care Bundle.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Methods for estimating beneficiary populations targeted by health and nutrition interventions for women, pregnant women, infants, and young children.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Assessing Internet Quality Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Understanding Health Information Systems Utilization Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Frailty indices based on routinely collected data: a scoping review.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
- Vehicle extrication in road traffic crashes: a descriptive analysis of an advanced medical rescue service in South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025Article
- To what extent is equity entrenched in HIV/AIDS-related policy documents in Ethiopia? A policy content analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Workload in antenatal care before and after implementation of an electronic decision support system: an observed time-motion study of healthcare providers in Nepal.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Observational
- Neonatal indicator data in Tanzania District Health Information System: evaluation of availability and quality of selected newborn indicators, 2015-2022.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Electronic oral health surveillance system for Egyptian preschoolers using District Health Information System (DHIS2): design description and time motion study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Health data management practice and associated factors among health professionals working in public health facilities in Oromia Special Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Improvements in Obstetric and Newborn Health Information Documentation following the Implementation of the Safer Births Bundle of Care at 30 Facilities in Tanzania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecording and reporting health data in facilities is the backbone of routine health information systems which provide data collected by health facility workers during service provision. Data is firstly collected in a register, to record patient health data and care process, and tallied into nationally designed reporting forms. While there is anecdotal evidence of large numbers of registers and reporting forms for primary health care (PHC) facilities, there are few systematic studies to document this potential burden on health workers. This multi-country study aimed to document the numbers of registers and reporting forms use at the PHC level and to estimate the time it requires for health workers to meet data demands.
methodsIn Cambodia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria and Tanzania, a desk review was conducted to document registers and reporting forms mandated at the PHC level. In each country, visits to 16 randomly selected public PHC facilities followed to assess the time spent on paper-based recording and reporting. Information was collected through self-reports of estimated time use by health workers, and observation of 1360 provider-patient interactions. Data was primarily collected in outpatient care (OPD), antenatal care (ANC), immunization (EPI), family planning (FP), HIV and Tuberculosis (TB) services.
resultCross-countries, the average number of registers was 34 (ranging between 16 and 48). Of those, 77% were verified in use and each register line had at least 20 cells to be completed per patient. The mean time spent on recording was about one-third the total consultation time for OPD, FP, ANC and EPI services combined. Cross-countries, the average number of monthly reporting forms was 35 (ranging between 19 and 52) of which 78% were verified in use. The estimated time to complete monthly reporting forms was 9 h (ranging between 4 to 15 h) per month per health worker.
conclusionsPHC facilities are mandated to use many registers and reporting forms pausing a considerable burden to health workers. Service delivery systems are expected to vary, however an imperative need remains to invest in international standards of facility-based registers and reporting forms, to ensure regular, comparable, quality-driven facility data collection and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.