ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021
Comparisons of the therapeutic safety of seven oral antimuscarinic drugs in patients with overactive bladder: a network meta-analysis.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating the challenges of overactive bladder management in women.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Investigating the link between Japanese Anticholinergic Risk Scale and laxative prescription in older adults: A cross-sectional study of 9,838 patients using dispensing claims from community pharmacies.Global health & medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated management strategies for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Frontiers in urology · 2025Review
- Management of use of urinary antimuscarinics and alpha blockers for benign prostatic hyperplasia in older adults at risk of falls: a clinical review.European geriatric medicine · 2023Review
- Daidzein is theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis network meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety profiles of seven commonly used oral antimuscarinic drugs (darifenacin, fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin, and tolterodine) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies comparing one or more antimuscarinic drugs for treating OAB with reported adverse effects (AEs) were eligible. Data were extracted, and a network meta-analysis was performed by two authors independently.
resultsForty-five RCTs and 124,587 patients were included. The results demonstrated that tolterodine had better safety outcomes for 7 out of 12 major AEs, including dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, dizziness, urinary tract infection, dry eyes, and dry skin. Darifenacin, fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, and solifenacin presented comparable safety profiles.
conclusionsTolterodine may be preferable as it showed a reduced association with important AEs. Darifenacin, fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, and solifenacin have similar safety profiles in treating patients with OAB. Taken together, this analysis provides a valuable overview of the therapeutic safety for oral antimuscarinic drugs and is useful for personalized medicine in patients with OAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.