Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34510820›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Stereotactic biopsy for adult brainstem lesions: A surgical approach and its diagnostic value according to the 2016 World Health Organization Classification.

In-Ho Jung, Kyung Won Chang, So Hee Park, Ju Hyung Moon, Eui Hyun Kim, Hyun Ho Jung, Seok-Gu Kang, Jong Hee Chang, Jin Woo Chang, Won Seok Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. How and why I fell into neuropathology.Free neuropathology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

In-Ho JungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-5743
Kyung Won ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
So Hee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-8587
Ju Hyung MoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eui Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2523-7122
Hyun Ho JungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Woo ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Seok ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-4016

Funding

Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics SRFC-IT2001-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe brainstem has the critical role of regulating cardiac and respiratory function and it also provides motor and sensory function to the face via the cranial nerves. Despite the observation of a brainstem lesion in a radiological examination, it is difficult to obtain tissues for a pathological diagnosis because of the location and small volume of the brainstem. Thus, we aimed to share our 6-year experience with stereotactic biopsies from brainstem lesions and confirm the value and safety of stereotactic biopsy on this highly eloquent area in this study.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 42 adult patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy on brainstem lesions from 2015 to 2020. The radiological findings, surgical records, pathological diagnosis, and postoperative complications of all patients were analyzed.

resultsHistopathological diagnoses were made in 40 (95.2%) patients. Astrocytic tumors were diagnosed in 29 (69.0%) patients, diffuse large B cell lymphoma in 5 (11.9%) patients, demyelinating disease in 4 (9.5%) patients, germinoma in 1 (2.4%) patient, and radiation necrosis in 1 (2.4%) patient. In the 40 patients with successful stereotactic biopsy, 10 (25.0%) patients had inconsistent preoperative radiological diagnosis and postoperative pathological diagnosis. In addition, there was a difference between the treatments prescribed by the radiological and pathological diagnoses in 8 out of 10 patients whose diagnoses changed after biopsy. There was no operative mortality among the 42 patients.

conclusionsA pathological diagnosis can be made safely and efficiently in brainstem lesions using stereotactic biopsy. This pathological diagnosis will enable patients to receive appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

Stereotaxic TechniquesAdultBiopsyBrain StemBrain Stem NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective Studiesbrainstemdiffuse midline gliomamedulla oblongatamidbrainponsStereotactic biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34510820
PMCPMC8559459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.